State of Louisiana v. Kevin Russell Martin
Also decided on this docket: La. Ct. App. 3d Cir., December 28, 2012; La. Ct. App. 3d Cir., November 7, 2012
State of Louisiana v. Kevin Russell Martin, No. KA-0012-0395 (La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. Apr. 17, 2013).
Opinion text
STATE OF LOUISIANA
COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT
12-395
ON REHEARING
STATE OF LOUISIANA
VERSUS
KEVIN RUSSELL MARTIN
**********
APPEAL FROM THE
THIRTY-FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT
PARISH OF JEFFERSON DAVIS, NO. CR-2011-2
HONORABLE STEVE GUNNELL, DISTRICT JUDGE
**********
ELIZABETH A. PICKETT
JUDGE
**********
Court composed of Ulysses Gene Thibodeaux, Chief Judge, Sylvia R. Cooks and
Elizabeth A. Pickett, Judges.
Cooks, J., dissents.
AFFIRMED.
Bennett R. Lapoint
Assistant District Attorney – Thirty-First Judicial District
P. O. Box 1388
Jennings, LA 70546
(337) 824-3311
COUNSEL FOR APPELLEE:
State of Louisiana
Pride Doran
The Doran Law Firm
P. O. Box 2119
Opelousas, LA 75071
(318) 948-8008
COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT:
Kevin Martin
PICKETT, Judge.
ON REHEARING
The record demonstrates clearly that the initial plea was properly taken.
While the defendant was misinformed regarding parole and good time eligibility,
he was allowed to ask the court any questions about his plea and on the form he
signed. He indicated he had none. His motion to withdraw his plea was fixed for
hearing. At the hearing, he failed to present any evidence. He simply presented an
argument that his plea was not knowingly and voluntarily made. He went on to
say that “[t]here’s really no argument further than that, Your Honor . . . .”
As the defendant has already had a hearing in the trial court and he failed to
show why his plea was not knowingly and voluntarily made, we find no support
for the contention that he is entitled to another hearing. The defendant’s
conviction is affirmed.