State of Louisiana v. Shelwin Markise Jones
State of Louisiana v. Shelwin Markise Jones, No. KA-0012-1436 (La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. Mar. 6, 2013).
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- State v. Michael 904 So. 2d 681
Opinion text
NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION
STATE OF LOUISIANA
COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT
12-1436
STATE OF LOUISIANA
VERSUS
SHELWIN MARKISE JONES
************
APPEAL FROM THE
NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT
PARISH OF RAPIDES, NO. 267,161
HONORABLE WILLIAM ROSS FOOTE, DISTRICT JUDGE
************
PHYLLIS M. KEATY
JUDGE
************
Court composed of Elizabeth A. Pickett, Phyllis M. Keaty, and John E. Conery,
Judges.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
James M. Buck
Assistant District Attorney – 9th JDC
P. O. Box 1472
Alexandria, LA 71309
(318) 473-6650
COUNSEL FOR APPELLEE:
State of Louisiana
Beth Fontenot
Louisiana Appellate Project
P. O. Box 3183
Lake Charles, LA 70602
(337) 491-3864
COUNSEL FOR APPELLANT:
Shelwin Markise Jones
Keaty, Judge.
The Defendant, Shelwin Markise Jones, was charged by bill of information
with carjacking, a violation of La.R.S. 14:64.2, and armed robbery, a violation of
La.R.S. 14:64. On March 3, 2003, the State amended the charge of carjacking to
accessory after the fact and entered a nolle prosequi for the charge of armed
robbery. In exchange, the Defendant entered a guilty plea to accessory after the
fact. On that same date, the Defendant waived sentencing delays, and he was
sentenced to five years at hard labor.
On November 15, 2012, the Defendant filed a motion seeking an appeal,
which was granted by the trial court on November 16, 2012.
On December 28, 2012, this court issued an order for the Defendant to show
cause why his appeal should not be dismissed as untimely perfected, citing
La.Code Crim. P. art. 930.8 and State v. Theard, 04-1212 (La. 6/17/05), 904 So.2d
681. In response, the Defendant conceded that the appeal was untimely perfected
and should be dismissed as untimely.
Accordingly, the Defendant’s appeal is dismissed.