KA-0016-0544 Nonprecedential Granted Processed

State of Louisiana v. Bryan Anthony Segura AKA Brian Segura

Louisiana Court of Appeal, Third Circuit · Filed August 31, 2016

Opinion text

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION

STATE OF LOUISIANA

COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT

16-544

STATE OF LOUISIANA

VERSUS

BRYAN ANTHONY SEGURA
AKA BRIAN SEGURA

************
APPEAL FROM THE
SIXTEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT
PARISH OF IBERIA DOCKET NUMBER 11-866
HONORABLE LORI A. LANDRY, JUDGE

************
JIMMIE C. PETERS
JUDGE
************

Court composed of Jimmie C. Peters, Elizabeth A. Pickett, and John E. Conery,
Judges.

APPEAL DISMISSED. DEFENDANT-APPELLANT IS
PERMITTED TO FILE AN APPLICATION FOR
SUPERVISORY WRITS WITHIN THIRTY DAYS
FROM THE DATE OF THIS DECISION.

Brandon Fremin
Assistant Attorney General
P.O. Box 94005
Baton Rouge, LA 70804
Telephone: (225) 326-6200
COUNSEL FOR APPELLEE:
State of Louisiana

Susan K. Jones
12320 LA HWY 44, Bldg. 4, Ste. B
Gonzales, LA 70737
Telephone: (225) 647-9673

Stephen J. Haedicke
639 Loyola Ave., #1820
New Orleans, LA 70113
Telephone: (504) 525-1328

COUNSELS FOR APPELLANT:
Bryan Anthony Segura
aka Brian Segura

Peters, Judge.

On August 8, 2011, Defendant-Appellant, Bryan Anthony Segura, aka Brian

Segura, was charged by grand jury indictment with two counts of aggravated

kidnapping, a violation of La.R.S. 14:44, and one count of armed robbery, a

violation of La.R.S. 14:64. On October 13, 2011, Defendant-Appellant was found

guilty as charged. On February 10, 2012, Defendant-Appellant was sentenced to

life imprisonment at hard labor on each aggravated kidnapping conviction and fifty

years at hard labor on the armed robbery conviction. The sentences were ordered

to run concurrently, without the benefit of probation, parole, or suspension of

sentence, with credit given for time served. The sentences were also ordered to run

consecutively to the sentences currently being served in Iberia Parish docket

numbers 99-1846, 99-1961, 00-333, 00-334, and Lafayette Parish docket number

88-0759.

On June 22, 2015, Defendant-Appellant filed a “UNIFORM

APPLICATION FOR POST-CONVICTION RELIEF” with the trial court. On

July 8, 2015, the trial court ordered the State to file a brief in response to

Defendant-Appellant’s application for post-conviction relief by August 10, 2015.

On August 10, 2015, Defendant-Appellant filed an “AMENDED PETITION FOR

POST-CONVICTION RELIEF” with the trial court. The State filed a response to

Defendant-Appellant’s application for post-conviction relief, entitled “STATE’S

ANSWER AND MOTION TO DISMISS PETITIONER’S APPLICATION FOR

POST[-]CONVICTION RELIEF” on August 11, 2015. On February 17, 2016, an

evidentiary hearing was held; thereat, the trial court denied Defendant-Appellant’s

“UNIFORM APPLICATION FOR POST-CONVICTION RELIEF.”

1

On March 9, 2016, Defendant-Appellant filed a “NOTICE OF APPEAL”

and a “DESIGNATION OF RECORD ON APPEAL” with the trial court. The

trial court granted Defendant-Appellant’s notice on March 14, 2016.

On June 28, 2016, this court lodged the appeal record. On July 5, 2016, this

court issued a rule to show cause why the appeal should not be dismissed, as the

judgment at issue is not an appealable judgment. La.Code Crim.P. art. 930.6(A).

On July 26, 2016, Defendant-Appellant filed a “RESPONSE TO SHOW

CAUSE ORDER” with this court. Defendant-Appellant responded, acknowledging

that he “agrees that this appeal should be dismissed.” Defendant-Appellant

“requests that this Court construe the ‘Notice of Appeal’ filed in the District Court

as a timely filed ‘Notice of Intent to Seek Writs,’ and grant him thirty days in

which to file a proper application for supervisory writs in this Court.”

Accordingly, the appeal in this case is hereby dismissed. Defendant-

Appellant’s request to construe the motion for appeal as a timely-filed notice of

intent to seek a supervisory writ is hereby granted and Defendant-Appellant is

hereby permitted to file a proper application for supervisory writs, in compliance

with Uniform Rules—Courts of Appeal, Rule 4, no later than thirty days from the

date of this decision.

APPEAL DISMISSED. DEFENDANT-APPELLANT IS PERMITTED TO

FILE AN APPLICATION FOR SUPERVISORY WRITS WITHIN THIRTY

DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THIS DECISION.

2