State of Louisiana v. Joshua Mayeaux A/K/A Joshua B. Mayeaux

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION

STATE OF LOUISIANA

COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT

18-383

STATE OF LOUISIANA

Plaintiff-Appellee

VERSUS

JOSHUA MAYEAUX
A/K/A JOSHUA B. MAYEAUX

Defendant-Appellant

************
APPEAL FROM THE
TWELFTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT
PARISH OF AVOYELLES, NO. 17-199960
HONORABLE WILLIAM J. BENNETT, JUDGE

************
JOHN E. CONERY
************

Court composed of John E. Conery, Kent D. Savoie, and Van H. Kyzar, Judges.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

Charles A. Riddle, III
District Attorney, 12th Judicial District
P. O. Box 1200
Marksville, Louisiana 71351

Anthony F. Salario
Assistant District Attorney, 12th Judicial District
P.O. Box 503
Marksville, Louisiana 71351
COUNSEL FOR APPELLEE:
State of Louisiana

Chad Ikerd
Louisiana Appellant Project
P.O. Box 2125
Lafayette, Louisiana 70502-2125
COUNSEL FOR APPELLANT:
Joshua Mayeaux
a/k/a Joshua B. Mayeaux

Conery, Judge.
On April 25, 2017, Defendant-Appellant, Joshua Mayeaux, a/k/a Joshua B.

Mayeaux, was charged by bill of information with seven counts of unauthorized

use of an access card, violations of La.R.S. 14:67.3. On November 13, 2017,

Defendant-Appellant pled guilty to the charges. On February 14, 2018, Defendant-

Appellant was sentenced to three months in the Avoyelles Parish jail on each

count, to run concurrently with each other and any other sentence previously

imposed.

On March 7, 2018, Defendant-Appellant filed a “MOTION TO

RECONSIDER SENTENCE” with the trial court. On March 8, 2018, the trial

court denied the motion.

On March 15, 2018, Defendant-Appellant filed a “NOTICE OF APPEAL

WITH DESIGNATION OF RECORD AND MOTION TO APPOINT

APPELLANT COUNSEL” with the trial court. On the same date, the trial court

granted the notice and ordered that the Louisiana Appellate Project be appointed to

represent Defendant-Appellant for appellate purposes. On May 15, 2018, this

court lodged the appeal record. On June 12, 2018, this court issued a rule to show

cause why the appeal should not be dismissed as non-appealable, since the offenses

at issue are misdemeanors. La.Code Crim.P.art. 912.1. Defendant-Appellant did

not respond. Accordingly, the appeal in this case is hereby dismissed.

APPEAL DISMISSED.