State of Louisiana v. Korri Devon Thornton
State of Louisiana v. Korri Devon Thornton, No. KA-0020-0425 (La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. May 5, 2021).
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- State v. Mayfield 261 So. 3d 101
- State v. Mayfield 273 So. 3d 316
- State v. Wommack 770 So. 2d 365
- State v. Wommack 797 So. 2d 62
- 298 So. 3d 326 not in our corpus
- 303 So. 3d 649 not in our corpus
Opinion text
STATE OF LOUISIANA
COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT
20-425
STATE OF LOUISIANA
VERSUS
KORRI DEVON THORNTON
**********
APPEAL FROM THE
NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT
PARISH OF RAPIDES, NO. 341,448
HONORABLE MARY LAUVE DOGGETT, DISTRICT JUDGE
**********
JOHN D. SAUNDERS
JUDGE
**********
Court composed of John D. Saunders, Candyce G. Perret, and Jonathan W. Perry,
Judges.
CONVICTION AND SENTENCE VACATED;
REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.
J. Phillip Terrell, Jr.
District Attorney
Ninth Judicial District Court
Catherine L. Davidson
Assistant District Attorney
P. O. Box 7358
Alexandria, La 71306-7358
(318) 473-6650
COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF/APPELLEE:
State of Louisiana
Paula C. Marx
Louisiana Appellate Project
P. O. Box 82389
Lafayette, LA 70598-2389
(337) 991-9757
COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT/APPELLANT:
Korri Devon Thornton
SAUNDERS, Judge.
Defendant, Korri Devon Thornton, was charged by bill of information with
second degree murder, a violation of La.R.S. 14:30.1, and possession of a firearm
by a convicted felon, a violation of La.R.S. 14:95.1. After pleading not guilty to the
charges, Defendant was tried by a jury and convicted of both charges; although the
verdict on Defendant’s possession of a firearm by a convicted felon was by
unanimous jury, the second degree murder conviction was not. For his conviction of
second degree murder, the trial judge sentenced Defendant to life imprisonment at
hard labor without benefit of parole, probation, or suspension of sentence. For his
conviction of possession of a firearm by a convicted felon, the trial judge sentenced
him to serve ten years at hard labor without benefit of parole, probation, or
suspension of sentence. The trial court ordered that the sentences were to run
concurrently.
FACTS:
On June 10, 2018, Defendant, a convicted felon, shot the victim, LaShun
Henderson, after the victim arrived at a store parking lot where Defendant and his
friends had been playing dice. LaShun Henderson died at the scene.
ERRORS PATENT:
In accordance with La.Code Crim.P. art. 920, all appeals are reviewed by this
court for errors patent on the face of the record. After reviewing the record, we find
there is one error patent involving the non-unanimous jury verdict for count one. We
will address this issue in Defendant’s Assignment of Error. Additionally, we note an
error patent involving the sentence imposed for count two. Finally, we note an error
patent involving the advice given by the trial court regarding the time for filing post-
conviction relief.
As for the error patent involving the sentence for count two, the sentencing
court was required to impose a fine of not less than one thousand dollars nor more
than five thousand dollars for Defendant’s conviction of possession of a firearm by
a convicted felon. La.R.S. 14:95.1. The trial court failed to impose the mandatory
fine, rendering the sentence for possession of a firearm by a convicted felon illegally
lenient. However, this court will not consider an illegally lenient sentence unless it
is an error raised on appeal. State v. Mayfield, 18-420 (La.App. 3 Cir. 12/6/18), 261
So.3d 101, writ denied, 19-46 (La. 5/28/19), 273 So.3d 316.
Additionally, the transcript of sentencing indicates the trial court failed to
properly advise Defendant of the time limitation for filing an application for post-
conviction relief. According to the transcript, the trial court informed Defendant that
he had “32 years” to file applications for post-conviction relief after the judgment of
conviction and sentence became final. Louisiana Code of Criminal Procedure Article
930.8 provides the defendant has two years after the conviction and sentence become
final to seek post-conviction relief. Although the minutes state the trial court
informed Defendant he had “(2) years to file a Motion of Post Conviction Relief,”
the transcript prevails when it conflicts with the minutes. State v. Wommack, 00-137,
(La.App. 3 Cir. 6/7/00), 770 So.2d 365, writ denied, 00-2051 (La. 9/21/01), 797
So.2d 62. Even though the “32-year” comment may be a typographical error rather
than an actual erroneous statement by the trial court, out of an abundance of caution,
we direct the trial court to inform Defendant of the provisions of La.Code Crim.P.
art. 930.8 by sending written notice to Defendant within ten days of the rendition of
this opinion and to file written proof in the record that Defendant received the notice.
State v. Williams, 19-718 (La.App. 3 Cir. 5/6/20), 298 So.3d 326, writ denied, 20-
644 (La. 11/4/20), 303 So.3d 649.
2
ASSIGNMENT OF ERROR:
Defendant’s conviction for second degree murder was returned by a
nonunanimous jury. Accordingly, he contends his conviction should be vacated as
required by Ramos v. Louisiana, 590 U.S. ––––, 140 S.Ct. 1390, 206 L.Ed.2d 583
(2020). The State agrees with Defendant’s argument.
Although the concurring justices in Ramos did not join in all parts of the
majority opinion, the Supreme Court unambiguously determined that nonunanimous
verdicts are not permitted by the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution.
The prohibition applies to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment. Id. at p.
1397; see also concurrences by Justices Sotomayor, Kavanaugh, and Thomas. The
decision applies to cases pending on direct review.
Defendant’s case was still in the process of direct review at the time of the
Ramos decision. Thus, Ramos applies and requires Defendant’s conviction for
second degree murder by a nonunanimous jury to be vacated.
CONCLUSION:
We vacate Defendant’s conviction and sentence for second degree murder and
remand the case for a new trial pursuant to Ramos. Additionally, as to the conviction
for possession of a firearm by a convicted felon, we direct the trial court to inform
Defendant of the provision of La.Code Crim.P. art. 930.8 by sending written notice
within ten days of the rendition of this opinion and to file written proof in the record
that Defendant received the notice.
CONVICTION AND SENTENCE VACATED; REMANDED WITH
INSTRUCITONS.
3