State of Louisiana v. Robert Revoillez Sassp Gallow
State of Louisiana v. Robert Revoillez Sassp Gallow, No. KA-0021-0100 (La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. May 5, 2021).
Opinion text
NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION
STATE OF LOUISIANA
COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT
21-100
STATE OF LOUISIANA
VERSUS
ROBERT GALLOW
************
APPEAL FROM THE
FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT
PARISH OF LAFAYETTE, NO. CR 178555
HONORABLE MARILYN CARR CASTLE, DISTRICT JUDGE
************
SHARON DARVILLE WILSON
JUDGE
************
Court composed of Billy H. Ezell, Candyce G. Perret, and Sharon Darville Wilson,
Judges.
APPEAL DISMISSED. DEFENDANT-
APPELLANT IS GIVEN FIFTEEN DAYS TO
FILE AN APPLICATION FOR
SUPERVISORY WRITS.
Donald Dale Landry
District Attorney – 15th Judicial District
Celeste White
Assistant District Attorney – 15th Judicial District
P. O. Box 3306
Lafayette, LA 70502
(337) 232-5170
COUNSEL FOR APPELLEE:
State of Louisiana
Annette Fuller Roach
Louisiana Appellate Project
P. O. Box 1747
Lake Charles, LA 70602-1747
(337) 436-2900
COUNSEL FOR APPELLANT:
Robert Gallow
WILSON, Judge.
On October 5, 2020, Defendant-Appellant, Robert Gallow, was charged by
bill of information with domestic violence, in violation of La.R.S. 14:35.3(K); two
counts of false imprisonment, in violation of La.R.S. 14:46; resisting arrest, in
violation of La.R.S. 14:108; domestic abuse battery, in violation of La.R.S.
14:35.3; and flight from an officer, in violation of La.R.S. 14:108(B)(1)(a).
Defendant-Appellant filed a pro se “Motion to Quash” on October 23, 2020,
asserting he was arrested on August 5, 2020, and that the time limitations of
La.Code Crim.P. arts. 532(7), 581, and 701(B) and (C) had expired. He requested
discharge from custody and dismissal of the charges. The trial court denied the
motion on October 27, 2020, based on the bill of information having been filed on
October 5, 2020.
On November 30, 2020, Defendant-Appellant filed a pro se “Motion to
Appeal” from the trial court’s October 27, 2020 ruling. The trial court granted an
appeal.
Defendant-Appellant’s trial counsel filed a “Motion for Release of
Defendant [for] Failure to Arraign as Required by La. C.Cr.P. Art. 701B(1) and C”
on November 24, 2020. A hearing was held on December 9, 2020. The trial court
denied the motion. Counsel for Defendant-Appellant filed a supervisory writ
application seeking review of the trial court’s December 9, 2020 ruling. On
February 12, 2021, this Court denied Defendant-Appellant’s writ application
finding his illegal detention ceased when he was arraigned.
On February 2, 2021, this Court issued a “Rule to Show Cause” why
Defendant-Appellant’s appeal should not be dismissed as the judgment is not
appealable. On February 22, 2021, this Court received appellate counsel’s
response to the “Rule to Show Cause,” wherein she concedes the proper mode of
review is by supervisory writ application.
Defendant-Appellant, Robert Gallow, is hereby permitted to file a proper
application for supervisory writs, in compliance with Uniform Rules‒Courts of
Appeal, Rule 4, no later than fifteen days from the date of this decision. Defendant
is not required to file a notice of intent to seek writs nor obtain an order setting a
return date pursuant to Uniform Rules―Courts of Appeal, Rule 4-3, as we hereby
construe the motion for appeal as a notice of intent to seek a supervisory writ.
APPEAL DISMISSED. DEFENDANT-APPELLANT IS PERMITTED TO
FILE AN APPLICATION FOR SUPERVISORY WRITS WITHIN FIFTEEN
DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THIS DECISION.
2