DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Clark, 499 So. 2d 332.

81 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. Allen Clayton Fulks La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
    2 Cir. 1986), writ denied, the viciousness of the crimes, (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. O'Shay Devan Hicks La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
    2d Cir.1986), writ denied, the viciousness of the crimes, (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Thomas Calvin Henson, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
    2d Cir.1986), writ denied, the viciousness of the crimes, (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Kenny Roy Young La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
    2d Cir.1986), writ denied, the viciousness of the crimes, (La.App.
  • State v. Young 270 So. 3d 770 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
    2d Cir.1986), writ denied, ; the viciousness of the crimes, (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Walter Urena La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
    2d Cir.1986), writ denied, the viciousness of the crimes, (La.App.
  • State v. Urena 215 So. 3d 813 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    2d Cir.1986), writ denied, the viciousness of the crimes, (La.App.
  • State v. Simpson 186 So. 3d 195 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
    2d Cir.1986), writ denied, the viciousness of the crimes, (La.App.
  • State v. Robinson 163 So. 3d 829 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
    2d Cir.1986), writ denied, ); the viciousness of the crimes ( (La.App.
  • State v. Craft 162 So. 3d 539 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    2d Cir.1986), writ denied, the viciousness of the crimes, (La.App.
  • State v. Gaubert 167 So. 3d 110 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2014
    2050 , 85 L.Ed.2d 322 (1985); (La.App.
  • State v. Herrington 152 So. 3d 202 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    2d Cir.1986), writ denied, the viciousness of the crimes, (La.App.
  • State v. Tillman 104 So. 3d 480 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
    2 Cir. 1986), writ denied, the viciousness of the crimes, the harm done to the victims, (La.App.
  • State v. Moton 73 So. 3d 503 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    2d Cir.1986), writ denied, the viciousness of the crimes, (La.App.
  • State v. Bobo 77 So. 3d 1 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    2 Cir.), writ denied, (1986); the viciousness of the crimes, (La.App.
  • State v. Nelson 25 So. 3d 905 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    2d Cir.1986), writ denied, the viciousness of the crimes, (La.App.
  • State v. Sumlin 25 So. 3d 931 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    2d Cir.1986), writ denied, the viciousness of the crimes, (La.App.
  • State v. Boudreaux 21 So. 3d 1022 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    1986); the viciousness of the crimes, (La.App.
  • State v. Boudreaux 21 So. 3d 1022 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    1986); the viciousness of the crimes, (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Gene Mitchell Olivier La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    2d Cir.1986), writ denied, the viciousness of the crimes, (La.App.
  • State v. AUGUILLARD 997 So. 2d 904 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    2d Cir.1986), writ denied, the viciousness of the crimes, (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Russell J. Auguillard, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    2d Cir.1986), writ denied, the viciousness of the crimes, (La.App.
  • State v. TURKS 997 So. 2d 743 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    2d Cir. 1986), writ denied, the viciousness of the crimes, (La.App.
  • STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS HECTOR LEYVA-MARTINEZ AKA HECTOR L. MARTINEZ AKA HECTOR LEYVA AKA HECTOR LAZARO LEYVA MARTINEZ La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    2d Cir.1986), writ denied, the viciousness of the crimes, (La.App.
  • State v. Leyva-Martinez 981 So. 2d 276 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    2d Cir.1986), writ denied, the viciousness of the crimes, (La.App.
  • State v. Harris 966 So. 2d 773 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    1986); the viciousness of the crimes, (La.App.
  • State v. Johnson 962 So. 2d 1126 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    1986); the viciousness of the crimes, (La.App.
  • State v. Parker 963 So. 2d 497 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    App. 2d Cir.1986), writ denied, (La.App.
  • State v. McDUFFEY 960 So. 2d 1175 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    2d Cir. 1986), writ denied, (1986); the viciousness of the crimes, (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Demarco D. Hawkins La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    2d Cir. 1986), writ denied, the viciousness of the crimes, (La.App.
  • State v. Hawkins 956 So. 2d 146 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    2d Cir.1986), writ denied, the viciousness of the crimes, (La.App.
  • State v. Boudreaux 945 So. 2d 898 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
    1986); the viciousness of the crimes, (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Karl Thibodeaux La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    2d Cir.1986), writ denied, the viciousness of the crimes, (La.App.
  • State v. Thibodeaux 924 So. 2d 1205 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    2d Cir.1986), writ denied, the viciousness of the crimes, (La.App.
  • State v. Caston 914 So. 2d 122 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
    2d Cir.1986), writ denied, the viciousness of the crimes, (La.App.
  • State v. Gatti 914 So. 2d 74 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
    2d Cir.), writ denied, ([La.]1986); • the viciousness of the crimes, (La.App.
  • State v. Dagenhart 908 So. 2d 1237 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
    2d Cir.1986), writ denied, the viciousness of the crimes, (La.App.
  • State v. Hopkins 908 So. 2d 1265 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
    2d Cir.1986), writ denied, 496 * the viciousness of the crimes, (La.
  • State v. Asad 870 So. 2d 455 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    2d Cir.), writ denied, (1986); the viciousness of the crimes, (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Dillon James Merritt La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    2d Cir.1986), writ denied, the viciousness of the crimes, (La.App.
  • State v. Merritt 875 So. 2d 80 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    1986); the viciousness of the crimes, (La.App.
  • State v. Hampton 865 So. 2d 284 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
    2 Cir.), writ denied, (1986); the viciousness of the crimes, (La.App.
  • State v. Jarrett 862 So. 2d 440 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    2d Cir.1986), writ denied, the viciousness of the crimes, (La.
  • State v. Wallace 862 So. 2d 286 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    In the instant case, just as in Scott , “[t]he defendant has not alleged or proven bad faith on the part of the prosecution.” Moreover, also as in Scott , in the instant case “there is sufficient evidence to connect the defendant with the crime for which he is charged independent of any inference in the district attorney’s opening statement.” (La.App.
  • State v. Howard 842 So. 2d 1233 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    2d Cir.1986), unit denied, ]; the viciousness of the crimes [ (La.App.
  • State v. Mandosia 842 So. 2d 1252 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    2d Cir.1986), writ denied, ]; the viciousness of the crimes [ (La.App.
  • State v. Hickerson 838 So. 2d 21 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    2050 , 85 L.Ed.2d 322 (1985); (La.App.
  • State v. Kirk 833 So. 2d 418 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
    2050 , 85 L.Ed.2d 322 (1985); (La.App.
  • State v. Gay 830 So. 2d 356 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
    1986); the viciousness of the crimes, (La.App.
  • State v. Gay 830 So. 2d 356 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    1986); the viciousness of the crimes, (La.App.