Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Banks, 496 So. 2d 1099.

15 citing documents.

State v. Gay 830 So. 2d 356 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
App. 4th Cir.12/28/94), ; (La.App.
State v. Gay 830 So. 2d 356 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
4th Cir.12/28/94), ; (La.App.
State v. Woods 828 So. 2d 6 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
State v. Camese 791 So. 2d 173 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
State v. Sullivan 729 So. 2d 1101 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
State v. Martin 638 So. 2d 411 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
2nd Cir.1987), writ denied, (La.App.
State v. Hawkins 631 So. 2d 1288 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
4th Cir.1992), writ denied, (La.App.
State v. Fluker 618 So. 2d 459 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
State v. Sparrow 612 So. 2d 191 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
2nd Cir.1987), writ denied, (La.App.
State v. Pittman 604 So. 2d 172 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
State v. Jones 572 So. 2d 769 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
The defense contends that the test for determining whether the prohibition against double jeopardy has been violated is whether each of the crimes requires proof of an additional element which the other crime does not, (La.App.
State v. Butler 557 So. 2d 471 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
State v. Lee 554 So. 2d 180 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
State v. Talbert 543 So. 2d 585 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
State v. Cass 514 So. 2d 589 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987