DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Soco, 508 So. 2d 915.

38 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. Tyrek Randall La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2025
  • State of Louisiana v. Christopher J. Brown La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
    GNMENT OF ERROR NO. 1 In Defendant’s only other assignment of error, he complains that “[t]he trial court imposed an illegal sentence at re-sentencing.” He argues that because the trial court altered his sentence without giving any objective information regarding Defendant’s conduct after the original sentencing that would justify a change, the change was illegal, (La.App.
  • State v. Brown 164 So. 3d 395 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    ASSIGNMENT OF ERROR NO. 1 In Defendant’s only other assignment of error, he complains that “[t]he trial court imposed an illegal sentence at re-sentencing.” He argues that because the trial court altered his sentence without giving any objective information regarding Defendant’s conduct after the original sentencing that would justify a change, the .change was illegal, (La.App.
  • State v. Bertrand 891 So. 2d 752 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
  • State v. Williams 833 So. 2d 428 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
  • State v. Baker 772 So. 2d 225 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    1983), appeal after remand (La.App.
  • State v. Donaldson 726 So. 2d 1003 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
    appeal after remand, (La.App.
  • State v. LeBleu 699 So. 2d 1156 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
    2072 , 23 L.Ed.2d 656 (1969); (La.App.
  • State v. Perkins 639 So. 2d 1199 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
  • State v. Berry 630 So. 2d 1330 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
  • State v. Bell 629 So. 2d 1318 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
  • State v. Powell 623 So. 2d 948 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
    appeal after remand (La.App.
  • State v. McDaniel 622 So. 2d 852 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
    appeal after remand, (La.App.
  • State v. Cook 598 So. 2d 423 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1992
    On page 720 [appeal after remand, (La.App.
  • State Ex Rel. Mitchell v. State 580 So. 2d 906 La. 1991
    Noting that he would have been eligible for parole under his original sentence in 11 years, 8 months (one-third of the sentence) and would not be eligible for parole under the new sentence for the full 33-year term thereof, defendant specifically asked that his sentence be reduced to 11 years, 8 months without eligibility for parole, (La.App.
  • State v. Camp 580 So. 2d 957 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1991
    In discussing elements which should be considered before imposing sentence, the Louisiana Supreme Court, appeal after remand, (La.
  • State v. Ellis 572 So. 2d 748 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
    appeal after remand, (La.App.
  • State v. Laird 572 So. 2d 793 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
    appeal after remand, (La.App.
  • State v. Perkins 568 So. 2d 610 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
  • State v. Jones 559 So. 2d 492 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1990
    In discussing elements which should be considered before imposing sentence, the Louisiana Supreme Court, appeal after remand, (La.App.
  • State v. Washington 557 So. 2d 368 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
    appeal after remand, (La.App.
  • State v. Dozier 553 So. 2d 931 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
  • State v. Avila 550 So. 2d 1374 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
    appeal after remand, (La.
  • State v. Mitchell 547 So. 2d 1136 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
  • State v. Williams 541 So. 2d 401 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
    1983), appeal after remand, (La.App.
  • State v. Cassell 540 So. 2d 1219 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
    appeal after remand, (La.App.
  • State v. Pattillo 534 So. 2d 65 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
    appeal after remand, (La.App.
  • State v. McNeil 534 So. 2d 68 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
    appeal after remand, (La.App.
  • State v. Langley 534 So. 2d 163 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
    appeal after remand, (La.App.
  • State v. Gleason 533 So. 2d 1032 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
  • State v. Edwards 532 So. 2d 304 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
    appeal after remand, (La.App.
  • State v. Clayton 532 So. 2d 357 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
    appeal after remand, (La.App.
  • State v. Fontenot 532 So. 2d 412 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
    appeal after remand (La.App.
  • State v. Matthews 532 So. 2d 270 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
  • State v. Love 535 So. 2d 420 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
    the convict’s personal history (age, family ties, marital status, health, employment record), prior criminal record or absence thereof, seriousness of the particular offense and the likelihood of recidivism or rehabilita-tion_” after remand, (La.
  • State v. Woodle 529 So. 2d 162 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
    Elements to consider in particularizing the sentence to defendant are “the convict’s personal history (age, family ties, marital status, health, employment record), prior criminal record or absence thereof, seriousness of the particular offense and the likelihood of recidivism or rehabilitation— ” after remand, (La.
  • State v. Deville 525 So. 2d 574 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
    appeal after remand (La.App.
  • State v. Cockerham 525 So. 2d 314 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
    amended and rendered on appeal after remand, (La.App.