Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Jones, 537 So. 2d 1244.

84 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Cardell A. Hayes La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2025
“Conflicting statements as to factual matters is a question that goes to the weight of the evidence, not sufficiency.” (La.
State of Louisiana v. Kenneth Collins La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2025
State of Louisiana v. Michael T. Robinson Denzel West Kirk Powell La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2024
State of Louisiana v. Jeremy Lance Morrow La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
State of Louisiana v. Kentrell Hickerson La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2020
“Conflicting statements as to factual matters is a question that goes to the weight of the evidence, not sufficiency.” (La.
State of Louisiana v. Chad M. Vidrine La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2020
State of Louisiana v. Manuel Dukes La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2019
Such a determination rests solely with the trier of fact, who may accept or reject, in whole or in part, the testimony of any witness.” Id., ( (La.
State v. Johnson 266 So. 3d 969 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
(citing State v. Jones , , 1249 (La.
State v. Moffett 247 So. 3d 908 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State v. Contreras 247 So. 3d 858 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
( citing State v. Jones , , 1249 (La.
State v. Alridge 249 So. 3d 260 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State v. Jones , , 1249 (La.
State v. Hutsell 241 So. 3d 542 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2018
State v. Jones , , 1249 (La.
State v. Harrison 239 So. 3d 406 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State v. Ballard 239 So. 3d 400 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State v. Cretian 238 So. 3d 473 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State v. Jones , , 1249 (La.App.
State v. Mahogany 225 So. 3d 489 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
State v. De Gruy 215 So. 3d 723 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Such a determination rests solely with the trier of fact, who may accept or reject, in whole or in part, the testimony of any witness.” Id., (La.
State v. Chambers 212 So. 3d 643 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
“Conflicting testimony as to factual matters is a question of weight of the evidence, not sufficiency.” (La.
State v. Scott 197 So. 3d 298 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Moreover, “[c]onflicting testimony as to factual matters is a question of weight of the evidence, not sufficiency.” (La.App.
State v. Hickman 194 So. 3d 1160 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State v. Everette 192 So. 3d 249 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State v. Rosiere, 488 So.2d at 968 (La.1986); (La.App.
State v. Rainey 189 So. 3d 439 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State v. Bernard 171 So. 3d 1063 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State v. Miner 163 So. 3d 132 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
4 Cir. 2/24/10), , (La.App.
State v. Berniard 163 So. 3d 71 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
4 Cir. 2/24/10), ( (La.App.
State v. Rapp 161 So. 3d 103 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Accordingly, “[e]ven where the record contains evidence conflicting with the testimony accepted by the trier of fact, the evidence accepted by the trier of fact is not rendered insufficient.” (La.App.
State v. Bowens 156 So. 3d 770 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Porter 151 So. 3d 871 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
4 Cir. 2/24/10), ( (La.App.
State v. Watson 147 So. 3d 1169 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
4 Cir. 12/21/10), ( (La.App.
State v. Cushenberry 146 So. 3d 777 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Quezada 141 So. 3d 906 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Scott 131 So. 3d 501 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Biddy 129 So. 3d 768 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Quinn 123 So. 3d 320 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
“Conflicting testimony as to factual matters is a question of weight of the evidence, not sufficiency.” (La.App.
State v. Davis 147 So. 3d 712 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Johnson 99 So. 3d 1057 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
As the trier of fact, a jury is free to accept or reject, in whole or in part, the testimony of any witness, (La.App.
State v. Guity 97 So. 3d 1113 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Williams 97 So. 3d 428 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Cavazos 94 So. 3d 870 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State of Louisiana v. Letrakus Tyler AKA Trey Tyler La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
State v. Wilson, 437 So.2d at 275; (La.App.
State v. Tyler 93 So. 3d 670 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Wilson, 437 So.2d at 275 ; (La.App.
State v. Pittman 85 So. 3d 782 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. McElveen 73 So. 3d 1033 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Fortenberry 73 So. 3d 391 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Pleasant 66 So. 3d 51 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Moreover, “[cjonfiicting testimony as to factual matters is a question of weight of the evidence, not sufficiency.” (La.App.
State v. Wells 64 So. 3d 303 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Green 62 So. 3d 229 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State Ex Rel. Tc 60 So. 3d 1260 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2011
State ex rel. T.C. 60 So. 3d 1260 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2011
State v. Domino 60 So. 3d 659 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by