DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Adams, 537 So. 2d 1262.

20 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana Versus Isaiah Doyle La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2021
  • State v. Griffin 176 So. 3d 561 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    uisiana Supreme Court noted the following: “The purpose of an offer of proof is to create a record of the excluded evidence so that the reviewing court will know what the evidence was and will thus be able to determine if the exclusion was improper, and if so, whether the improper exclusion' constituted reversible error.” Magee , 11-0574 at pp. 62-63, 103 So.3d at 327 -28 ( (La.App.
  • State v. Frith 151 So. 3d 946 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    See State v. Magee, 2011-0574, p. 63 (La.9/28/12), -328 , ( (La.App.
  • State v. Hankton 122 So. 3d 1028 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    See State v. Magee, 11-0574, p. 63 (La.9/28/12), -328 , (La.App.
  • State v. Breaux 110 So. 3d 281 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    5 Cir. 4/30/02) , ; (La.App.
  • State v. Meredith 155 So. 3d 555 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    A proffer can be “either in the form of a complete record of the excluded testimony or a statement describing what the party expects to establish by the excluded evidence.” Magee , 11-0574 at p. 61, 103 So.3d at 326 (-65 (La.App.
  • State v. Magee 103 So. 3d 285 La. 2012
  • State v. Green 84 So. 3d 573 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    5 Cir. 4/30/02) , ; (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Willard Brandenburg La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
  • State v. Brandenburg 949 So. 2d 625 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
  • State v. McCullough 774 So. 2d 1105 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
  • State v. Jordan 719 So. 2d 556 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
  • State v. Batiste 708 So. 2d 764 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
  • State v. Goodwin 640 So. 2d 890 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
  • State v. Larpenteur 636 So. 2d 1103 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
  • State v. Searcy 621 So. 2d 83 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
    writ granted, , affirmed in part, reversed in part, .
  • State v. Gantt 616 So. 2d 1300 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
  • Twin City Pontiac, Inc. v. Pickett 588 So. 2d 1125 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
    modified on other grounds, (La.App.
  • State v. Adams 550 So. 2d 595 La. 1989
  • State v. Adams 543 So. 2d 2 La. 1989
    Prior report: La.App., .