NO. 2017-CC-0380
Precedential
Reversed
Processed
Hooper v. Louisiana Pigment Co.
Hooper v. Louisiana Pigment Co., 218 So. 3d 627 (La. 2017).
Cited by
- State in the Interest of M. J. D. Iii.; T. C. M. D.; K. … La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
- Herman Lee Hooper v. Louisiana Pigment Company, Lp La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- Smith v. Thurman Oils, Inc. 951 So. 2d 359
- Spruell v. Dudley 951 So. 2d 1106
Opinion text
Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Calcasieu, 14th Judicial District Court Div. G, No. 2013-001665; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. CW16-00861 *628 h Granted in part. The judgment of the trial court granting the motion in limine is reversed insofar as it excludes evidence of the plaintiffs applications for disability benefits. See Cleveland v. Policy Management Systems Corp., 526 U.S. 795 (1999); Smith v. Thurman Oils, Inc., 06-0743 (La.App. 1 Cir. 12/28/06) , 951 So. 2d 359 , writ denied, 07-0207 (La. 3/23/07), 951 So. 2d 1106 . In all other respects, the writ is denied.