No. 00-C-0269
Precedential
Granted
Processed
Perkins v. Perkins
Perkins v. Perkins, 758 So. 2d 141 (La. 2000).
The holding in the court’s own words
After hearing oral arguments and reviewing the record of the matter, we conclude that the judgment below does not require the exercise of our supervisory authority.
Quoted verbatim from the opinion — no paraphrase, nothing generated. Not yet human-reviewed. How we find the holding.
Cited by
- Justin Hodges v. Amy Hodges 181 So. 3d 700 La. 2015
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- Lewis v. Medical Center of Louisiana 754 So. 2d 950
Opinion text
PER CURIAM. * Upon plaintiffs application, we granted certiorari in this case. Perkins v. Perkins, 00-0269 (La.2/16/00), 754 So.2d 950 . After hearing oral arguments and reviewing the record of the matter, we conclude that the judgment below does not require the exercise of our supervisory authority. Accordingly, we recall our order of February 16, 2000 as improvidently granted, and deny plaintiffs application. Knoll, J., not on panel. Rule IV, Part II, § 3.