No. 00-KK-0373 Precedential Granted Processed

State v. Duplechain

Louisiana Supreme Court · Filed October 27, 2000 · 772 So. 2d 90

The holding in the court’s own words

After hearing oral argument and reviewing the record in this case, we conclude that the judgment below does not require the exercise of our supervisory authority.

View full opinion text ↓

Quoted verbatim from the opinion — no paraphrase, nothing generated. Not yet human-reviewed. How we find the holding.

Cited by

State of Louisiana v. Christopher L. Jones La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2025
State Of Louisiana v. Ray Allen Parker La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2024
State of Louisiana Versus Jeremy Simmons La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2022
State Of Louisiana v. Michael Boeh La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
State Of Louisiana v. J Ay-quan Carter La. 2021
State of Louisiana v. James J. Flournoy La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
State v. Flournoy 209 So. 3d 150 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State v. Monroe 152 So. 3d 1011 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
State v. Smith 152 So. 3d 218 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
State of Louisiana v. Jean-Luc Arisme La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
State v. Arisme 123 So. 3d 1259 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Cooks 108 So. 3d 1257 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013

all 45 citing documents »

Authorities cited

Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.

J. E. Merit Constructors, Inc. v. Hickman 762 So. 2d 1114

Opinion text

PER CURIAM. Upon the State of Louisiana’s application, we granted certiorari in this case. State v. Duplechain, 762 So.2d 1114 (La.6/2/00). After hearing oral argument and reviewing the record in this case, we conclude that the judgment below does not require the exercise of our supervisory authority. Accordingly, we recall our order of June 2, 2000, as improvidently granted, and deny the State’s application.