Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Bachaud v. Committee on Bar Admissions, 773 So. 2d 663.

21 citing documents.

Steve Crooks v. State of La. Through the Dept. of Natural Resources La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
Ass’n v. State,00-0374, p. 5 (La.10/6/00)
State ex rel. Arnaud v. State 188 So. 3d 1004 La. 2016
Ass'n v. State, 00-0374, p, 5 (La.10/6/00), (“In adjudicating [a) conshTutlonal challenge, the court must analyze and Jnterpretthe language of tbe constitutional provision specified by the challenger.”)).
Estelle v. Eysinki 147 So. 3d 1136 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Ass’n v. State, 00-0374, p. 5 (La.10/6/00), .
Retired State Employees Ass'n v. State 119 So. 3d 568 La. 2013
Ass’n v. State, 00-0374, p. 5 (La.10/6/00), .
Louisiana Federation of Teachers v. State 118 So. 3d 1033 La. 2013
See Louisiana Municipal Association v. State, 00-0374, p. 5 (La.10/6/00), .
State v. Overstreet 111 So. 3d 308 La. 2013
Ass’n v. State, 00-0374, p. 5 (La.10/6/00), (“In adjudicating [a] constitutional challenge, the court must analyze and interpret the language of the constitutional provision specified by the challenger.”)).
In re Office of Chief Justice, Louisiana Supreme Court 101 So. 3d 9 La. 2012
Ass’n v. State, 00-0374, p. 5 (La.10/6/00), .
State of Louisiana v. v. L. G. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
Ass’n v. State, 00-0374, p. 5 (La.10/6/00), (―In adjudicating [a] constitutional challenge, the court must analyze and interpret the language of the constitutional provision specified by the challenger.‖)).
Parish of Jefferson v. Kennedy 28 So. 3d 301 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2009
Chrishon v. Marshall 994 So. 2d 585 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Ass'n v. State, 00-0374, p. 5 (La.10/6/00), .
James Roy Chrishon v. Louis J. Marshall, Sr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Ass’n v. State, 00-0374, p. 5 (La.10/6/00)
State v. Hatton 985 So. 2d 709 La. 2008
Ass'n v. State, 00-0374, p. 5 (La.10/6/00), ("In adjudicating [a] constitutional challenge, the court must analyze and interpret the language of the constitutional provision specified by the challenger.")).
Board of Directors v. All Taxpayers 938 So. 2d 11 La. 2006
Ass'n v. State, 00-0374, p. 5 (La.10/6/00), .
Beauclaire v. Greenhouse 922 So. 2d 501 La. 2006
State v. Expunged Record (No.) 249,044, 03-1940 at 4, 881 So.2d at 107 ; Louisiana Municipal Association v. State, 00-0374, p. 5 (La.10/6/00), .
State v. EXPUNGED RECORD NO. 249,044 881 So. 2d 104 La. 2004
Louisiana Municipal Association v. State of Louisiana, 00-0374 (La.10/6/00), .
Ernest v. Petroleum Service Corp. 868 So. 2d 96 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
Ass'n v. State, XXXX-XXXX, p. 6 (La.10/6/00), .
Motorola, Inc. v. Associated Indem. Corp. 867 So. 2d 723 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
Ass'n v. State, XXXX-XXXX (La.10/6/00), .
East Baton Rouge Parish Sch. Bd. v. Foster 851 So. 2d 985 La. 2003
Ass'n v. State, 00-0374, p. 5 (La.10/6/00), .
Motorola, Inc. v. Associated Indem. Corp. 867 So. 2d 715 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
Ass'n v. State, XXXX-XXXX (La.10/6/00), .
Twin B. Casinos, Inc. v. State ex rel. Louisiana Gaming Control Board 809 So. 2d 995 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
Louisiana Municipal Association v. State, 2000-0374, p. 5 (La.10/9/00), -667 .
Abuan ex rel. Valdez v. Smedvig Tankships, Ltd. 786 So. 2d 827 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
art. 9 is the Louisiana enactment of the “plain meaning rule” that “[w]hen the intention of the legislation is so apparent from the face of the statute that there can be no question as to its meaning, there is no room for construction.” Louisiana Municipal Association v. State of Louisiana, 2000-0374 (La.10/9/00); , quoting Norman J. Singer, Statutes and Statutory Construction § 46.01 (6th ed. 2000).