DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite In re Jordan, 775 So. 2d 1065.

14 citing documents.

  • In re Comm. On Bar Admissions CFN-9711 264 So. 3d 431 La. 2019
  • In re Committee on Bar Admissions CFN-9711 213 So. 3d 1148 La. 2017
    12/15/00), (explaining that an applicant who seeks to reapply after being denied admission must produce new evidence or show changed circumstances).
  • In re Committee on Bar Admissions CFN-3463 209 So. 3d 86 La. 2017
  • In re Committee on Bar Admissions CFN-3463 150 So. 3d 300 La. 2014
    2 See In re: Jordan, 00-3006 (La.12/15/00), (holding that once an applicant is denied admission to the bar, a subsequent application for admission will not be considered absent a “showing of facts relating to applicant’s character and fitness to practice law that have changed since this court denied [the] prior application.”).
  • In Re Jordan 85 So. 3d 683 La. 2012
    t, and thus raised the same issues we had considered and rejected in Jordan I. Accordingly, on December 15, 2000, we denied petitioner’s application for admission, and stated that she could “reapply only upon a showing of changed circumstances or evidence not previously submitted to this court warranting our reconsideration of the order rendered in” Jordan I. In re: Jordan, 00-3006 (La.12/15/00), (“Jordan II ”).
  • In re Maryland 69 So. 3d 416 La. 2011
    See In re: Jordan, 00-3006 (La.12/15/00), .
  • In Re Zohdy 46 So. 3d 657 La. 2010
    See In re: Jordan, 00-3006 (La.12/15/00), , and In re: Hinson-Lyles, 05-2446 (La.
  • In Re Garrett 12 So. 3d 332 La. 2009
    12/15/00), {‘‘Jordan II").
  • In Re Jordan 12 So. 3d 346 La. 2009
    In 2000, petitioner filed a second application for admission, which we denied because she made no showing of facts relating to her character and fitness to practice law that changed after the denial of her application in Jordan I. In re: Jordan, 00-3006 (La.12/15/00), (“Jordan II”).
  • In Re Esukpa 981 So. 2d 686 La. 2008
    See In re: Jordan, 00-3006 (La.12/15/00), .
  • In Re Browder 933 So. 2d 132 La. 2006
    See, In re Jordan, 00-3006 (La.12/15/00), .
  • In re Boyett 922 So. 2d 469 La. 2006
    See In re: Jordan, 00-3006 (La.12/15/00), and In re: Woodard, 02-2397 (La.11/5/02), .
  • In re Hinson-Lyles 919 So. 2d 721 La. 2006
    See In re: Jordan, 00-3006 (La.12/15/00), .
  • In re Woodard 831 So. 2d 888 La. 2002
    *889 See In re: Jordan, 00-3006 (La.12/15/00), .