No. 03-0212
Precedential
Processed
Dronet v. E-Z Mart
Dronet v. E-Z Mart, 862 So. 2d 1211 (La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003).
Opinion text
| -i COOKS, J., Dissenting in part and Concurring in part. I would reverse that portion of the judgment below granting the exception of prescription as it relates to temporary total disability. I am satisfied the record sufficiently establishes the claimant sustained an aggravation of her pre-existing work *1216 related condition. I concur in that position of this court’s opinion finding the claimant’s SEB claim has not prescribed. I do not feel as constrained as the majority in proceeding to rule on the merits of the claimant’s SEB claim.