Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Whitman v. Williams, 6 So. 3d 852.

13 citing documents.

  • Ferrand v. Ferrand 221 So. 3d 909 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    3 Cir. 2/4/09), ; Martin v. Dupont, 32,490, p. 6 (La.App.
  • Alex Ardoin v. Jasmine Grice La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
    3 Cir. 2/4/09), : [T]he “concept of parental primacy is well established in Louisiana law” and that a nonparent is “required to make a very strong showing before custody should be awarded in their favor.” Wilson v. Paul, 08- 382, p. 2 (La.App.
  • Ardoin v. Grice 190 So. 3d 440 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    3 Cir. 2/4/09), , 853: [T]he “concept of parental primacy is well established in Louisiana law” and that a nonparent is “required to make a very strong showing before custody should be awarded in their favor.” Wilson v. Paul, 08-382, p. 2 (La.App.
  • Duplessy v. Duplessy 102 So. 3d 209 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    3 Cir. *213 2/4/09), ; Martin v. Dupont, 32,490, p. 6 (La.App.
  • Joseph Prescia v. Gary O'Brien La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
  • Prescia v. O'Brien 87 So. 3d 345 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
  • Willard A. Harp v. Penny Darryl Penney La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    3 Cir. 2/4/09), (second alteration in original), stated: [T]he “concept of parental primacy is well established in Louisiana law” and that a nonparent is “required to make a very strong showing before custody should be awarded in their favor.” Wilson v. Paul, 6
  • Patricia Leblanc v. Shawnee Guillory La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    3 Cir. 2/4/09), a panel of this court explained: [T]he “concept of parental primacy is well established in Louisiana law” and that a nonparent is “required to make a very strong showing before custody should be awarded in their favor.” Wilson v. Paul, 08-382, p. 2 (La.App.
  • LeBlanc v. Guillory 38 So. 3d 490 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    3 Cir. 2/4/09), , a panel of this court explained: [T]he “concept of parental primacy is well established in Louisiana law” and that a nonparent is “required to make a very strong showing before custody should be awarded in their favor.” Wilson v. Paul, 08-382, p. 2 (La.App.
  • McCormic v. Rider 27 So. 3d 277 La. 2010
    3 Cir. 2/4/09) , ; Smith v. Tierney, 04-2482 (La.App.
  • Herbert and Martha Dalme v. Leah Dalme La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    3 Cir. 2/4/09), : We are mindful that the “concept of parental primacy is well established in Louisiana law” and that a nonparent is “required to make a very strong showing before custody should be awarded in their favor.” Wilson v. Paul, 08-382, p. 2 (La.App.
  • Lucille Marie McCormic and Jason Ray Craft v. Judith Ann Rider La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
  • McCormic v. Rider 19 So. 3d 628 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009