No. 09-963 Precedential Processed

Tyson v. King

Louisiana Court of Appeal, First Circuit · Filed February 3, 2010 · 29 So. 3d 719

Cited by

Jackie Doucet v. Darwin Select Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
Chase Home Finance, LLC v. Jacob Fox La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
Chase Home Finance, LLC v. Fox 150 So. 3d 603 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Roberts v. Rudzis 146 So. 3d 602 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Patrick Terrill Randall v. Xceptional Flooring, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
Randall v. Xceptional Flooring, Inc. 129 So. 3d 882 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Waste Management of Louisiana, LLC v. Penn-America Insurance Co. 110 So. 3d 200 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Waste Management of Louisiana, LLC v. Penn-America Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
Kimberly Crittenden Daigle v. Merrill Lynch La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
John K. Scarborough v. Carol A. Randle La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
Scarborough v. Randle 109 So. 3d 961 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Daigle v. Merrill Lynch 107 So. 3d 901 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013

Authorities cited

Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.

Schroeder v. Board of Sup'rs 591 So. 2d 342
Gonzales v. Xerox Corp. 320 So. 2d 163

Opinion text

THIBODEAUX, Chief Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part. | ,A remand is neither necessary nor appropriate. Summary judgments are reviewed de novo, using the same criteria as *723 the trial court in determining the appropriateness of a summary judgment, that is, whether there is a genuine issue of material fact and whether the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. See Schroeder v. Bd. of Supervisors of La. State Unit)., 591 So.2d 342 (La.1991). An intermediate appellate court has the authority, duty, and responsibility to decide the case if the record before us is complete. La.Code Civ.P. art. 2164; Gonzales v. Xerox Corp., 320 So.2d 163 (La.1975). This record is complete for summary judgment purposes. For the foregoing reasons, I respectfully dissent in part.