Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Landry v. Landry, 40 La. Ann. 229.
- Hughes v. Fitzhugh 269 So. 2d 325 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
- Lemoine v. Lemoine 27 So. 2d 650 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1946
- Lafield v. Balzrette 21 So. 2d 156 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1945
- Citizens Bank & Trust Co. v. Willis 162 So. 822 La. 1935
- Morris v. Morris 160 So. 134 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1935
- Collins v. Jones 152 So. 802 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1934
- McConnell v. Harris Chevrolet Co. 147 So. 827 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1933
- Guaranty Bank & Trust Co. v. Hunter 137 So. 904 La. 1931
- Loranger v. Citizens' Nat. Bank 111 So. 418 La. 1927
-
Barnes v. McCartney
3 La. App. 145
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1925
Ann. 966 , the court said: “When a contract, therefore, is attacked on the ground that the expressed consideration does not exist, or that there was no consideration for it, the party may show other consideration than that expressed in the contract.” See also, to the same effect: Landry vs. Landry, , 3 South.
-
Caraway v. Leblanc
1 La. App. 192
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1924
In this connection we have considered the language of C. C. Art. 1526 and Landry vs. Landry, , 3 South.
- Castleman v. Smith 99 So. 293 La. 1924
- Brewer v. New Orleans Land Co. 97 So. 605 La. 1923
- Commercial Germania Trust & Savings Bank v. White 81 So. 753 La. 1919
-
Cox v. Busch-Everett Oil Co.
60 So. 256
La. 1912
(O. S.) 85 (cited by counsel for defendant), *825 it does not appear that the donor divested himself of all his property, , 3 South.
-
Byrd v. Pierce
50 So. 452
La. 1909
384 , and authorities therein cited; , 3 South.
- Eugene Dietzgen Co. v. Kokosky 37 So. 24 La. 1904