Franz v. N. O. Coffee Co.
Also decided on this docket: La., May 15, 1888 40 La. Ann. 512
Franz v. N. O. Coffee Co., 8 La. App. 445 (La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1928).
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- Hanton v. New Orleans & C. R., Light & Power Co. 124 La. 562
- Griffith v. Keller 147 La. 540
- 153 La. 820 not in our corpus
- Smith v. Richland Compress & Warehouse Co. 96 So. 668
- First Nat. Bank of Miami v. Jefferson Const. Co. 162 La. 47
- Derbes v. Rogers 110 So. 84
Opinion text
WESTERFIELD, J. Plaintiff sued for $470.36 as damages alleged to be due him as a result of a collision between his automobile and one belonging to defendant. The examination of the first witness placed upon the stand by plaintiff disclosed the fact that plaintiff had been paid all of his alleged damages except $99.00 by an insurance company, whereupon the judge maintained an exception of no 'cause of action as to the amount paid and dismissed the suit for the remaining $99.00, because of the lack of jurisdiction. The judgment appealed from is clearly erroneous. Hanton, et al., vs. New Orleans and Carrollton R. L. and P. Company, 124 La. 562 , 50 So. 544 ; Griffith vs. Keller, 147 La. 540 , 85 So. 233 ; Smith vs. Richland Compress & Warehouse Company, 153 La. 820 , 96 So. 668 ; First National Bank of Miami vs. Jefferson Construction Company, 162 La. 47 , 110 So. 84 ; Hennican vs. Woodman, 1 La. App. 281 ; Hendren vs. Crescent City S. & M. Water Company, 1 La. App. 625 . The judgment appealed from is reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings according to law and the views herein expressed.