Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Guillotte v. Poincy, 41 La. Ann. 333.
- State Ex Rel. Porterie v. Smith 162 So. 413 La. 1935
-
Walmsley v. O'Hara
161 So. 587
La. 1935
*233 The plaintiffs in this case, who are the members of the boards in office, , 6 So.
- State Ex Rel. Bolin v. Webster Parish School Board 157 So. 142 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1934
-
Overruled
Dickson v. Hardy
144 So. 519
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1932
Guillotte v. Póincy, , 6 So.
-
Dastugue v. Cohen
131 So. 746
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1930
The principle enunciated in the leading case of Guillotte v. Poincy (1880) , and followed in the cases of Goldman v. Gillespie, 45 La.
-
Reynaud v. Songy
124 So. 684
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1929
Peters v. Bell, supra; , 6 So.
- Ferry Ex Rel. Ferry v. Buchler 117 So. 814 La. 1928
-
State ex rel. Thomas v. Fuller
8 La. App. 803
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1928
Ann. 493 ; Guillotte vs. Poincy, , 6 So.
- Blanchard v. Norman 114 So. 87 La. 1927
- State ex rel. Bourg v. Turner 94 So. 411 La. 1922
-
Gleason v. Wisdom
45 So. 530
La. 1908
He further, and, in the event that the inquiry should proceed thus far, refers the court to several decisions as supporting his right to an injunction pending a judicial determination of the question of his right to the office in dispute, , 6 South.
- Jackson v. Powell 44 So. 689 La. 1907
-
Sanders v. Emmer
39 So. 631
La. 1905
Respondent showed that the writ of injunction issued upon the allegations of the petition, showing Dr. Sanders to be in the actual possession of an office to which he claimed to have been elected, and showing him to be the de facto officer; respondent being guided by the authority set forth in the case of Guillotte v. Poincy, reported in , 6 South.