Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Otwell v. Otwell, 56 So. 3d 1232.
- Acadiana Renal Physicians, a Medical Corporation v. Our Lady of Lourdes Regionalmedical Center, Inc.,lafayette General Medical Center, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
-
Caitland Siobhan Hebert v. Keary Ryan Hebert
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
3 Cir. 2/9/11), ” Banerjee v. Banerjee, 17-245 p. 3, (La.App.
- Hebert v. Hebert 269 So. 3d 831 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
- Monojit Banerjee v. Shalini Banerjee La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
- Banerjee v. Banerjee 258 So. 3d 699 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
-
Daniel Kade Chamberlin v. Kristi Michelle Witten Chamberlin
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
3 Cir. 2/9/11), -34, “Whether a district court has subject matter jurisdiction over a case is subject to a de novo review.
-
Chamberlin v. Chamberlin
176 So. 3d 1118
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
3 Cir. 2/9/11), -34 , “Whether a district court has subject matter jurisdiction over a case is subject to a de novo review.
-
Myranda Adkins v. City of Natchitoches
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
3 Cir. 2/9/11), (citing Boudreaux v. State, DOTD, 01-1329 (La.
-
Adkins v. City of Natchitoches
150 So. 3d 646
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
3 Cir. 2/9/11) , (citing Boudreaux v. State, DOTD, 01-1329 (La.2/26/02), ).
- Hiser v. Fell 153 So. 3d 1177 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
- In re D.C.M. 170 So. 3d 165 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
-
Donald Brunt v. Lisa Ostic Abernathy
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
3 Cir. 2/9/11), -35, this court stated: A most basic tenet of our law is a court’s power to hear an action before it.
-
Brunt v. Abernathy
79 So. 3d 425
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
3 Cir. 2/9/11), -35 , this court stated: A most basic tenet of our law is a court’s power to hear an action before it.