Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Gilmer v. O'Neal, 32 La. Ann. 979.

16 citing documents.

Perkins v. Security Homestead Ass'n 471 So. 2d 301 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
90 ; Gilmer v. O’Neal, ; Babineau v. Guilbeau, 52 La.
Fussell v. Burris Bros. 139 So. 767 La. 1932
The court further correctly remarked that “the judgment creditors ar.e no better off now, so far as the debtor’s homestead is concerned, than they would be if he had never made the simulated transfer of it.” Appellant refers to the cases of Gilmer v. O’Neal, ; Babineau v. Guilbeau, 52 La.
Prichard v. McCranie 107 So. 461 La. 1926
Ann. 743 ; Gilmer v. O’Neal, ; Durham v. Williams, 32 La.
Andrews v. McCreary Lumber Co. 99 So. 579 La. 1924
Ann. 90 ; Gilmer v. O’Neal, ; Fruge v. Fulton, 120 La.
Mohawk Oil Co. v. Layne 86 So. 322 La. 1920
Ann. 962 ; Gilmer v. O’Neal, ; Dickson v. Dickson, 33 La.
Pizzolato v. Fontenot 85 So. 605 La. 1920
In Gilmer v. O’Neal, Sheriff, , it was held that the debtor, Gilmer, had lost his right to assert the homestead exemption by his failure to plead the exemption in the revocatory action brought by his creditors, by which they had succeeded in annulling a fraudulent conveyance of the homestead.
Jackson v. Hodges 76 So. 174 La. 1917
Ann. 90 , Gilmer v. O’Neal, , Fruge v. Fulton, 120 La.
Adams v. McCoy 72 So. 797 La. 1916
Ann. 805 ; Gilmer v. O’Neal, Sheriff, et al., ; Soulier v. Benker, Sheriff, et al., 37 La.
Coleman v. Continental Bank & Trust Co. 72 So. 742 La. 1916
Ann. 90 , Gilmer v. O’Neal, , and Johnson v. Agurs, 116 La.
Percy v. Ewing 69 So. 852 La. 1915
Ann. 805 ; Gilmer v. O’Neal, ; Tilton v. Vignes, 33 La.
Cunningham v. Steidman 62 So. 346 La. 1913
So in Gilmer v. O’Neal, , where this same prohibition was relied on (see fourth subdivision of counsel’s brief in that case), the court held that the homestead right must be asserted before a sheriff’s sale is made, or else the property will pass free from it.
Farley v. Frost-Johnson Lumber Co. 63 So. 122 La. 1913
In Gilmer v. O’Neal, , a creditor of Gilmer brought ah action en declaration de simulation to recover property which Gilmer had bought in the name of Sebastian; and, in defending the suit, Gilmer denied this ownership.
Bush v. Greenhoward 51 So. 207 La. 1910
le 245 of our present Constitution, which reads: “Rights to homestead or exemptions, under laws or contracts, or obligations existing at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall not be impaired, repealed or affected by any provision of this Constitution, or any laws passed in pursuance thereof.” In support of this contention, the decision of this court in the case of Gilmer v. O’Neal, , is relied on.
Ellis v. J. Freyhan & Co. 49 So. 975 La. 1909
Ann. 805 , Gilmer v. O’Neal, , Soulier v. Benker, Sheriff, 37 La.
Fruge v. Fulton 45 So. 595 La. 1908
Hollins v. Cropper 40 So. 378 La. 1906
Ann. 808 ; Gilmer v. O’Neal, ; Ohaffe & Sons v. McGehee, 38 La.