No. 10010 Precedential Affirmed Processed

Futch v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York

Louisiana Court of Appeal, First Circuit · Filed November 1, 1963 · 158 So. 2d 455

Also decided on this docket: La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., November 12, 1974 303 So. 2d 871; La. Ct. App. 4th Cir., April 10, 1979 370 So. 2d 660

Cited by

Futch v. Fidelity & Casualty Company 166 So. 2d 274 La. 1964
Futch v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. 160 So. 2d 230 La. 1964
Tucker v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York 158 So. 2d 453 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
Stuckey v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York 158 So. 2d 454 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963

Authorities cited

Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.

Tucker v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York 158 So. 2d 453
Stuckey v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York 158 So. 2d 454

Opinion text

HARDY, Judge. The facts and the law have been discussed in the cases of Tucker, La.App., 158 So. 2d 453 , and Stuckey, La.App., 158 So.2d 454 , against this defendant. The instant case presents an appeal by defendant from a judgment in the principal sum of $1,193.70 in favor of plaintiff. This amount represents the evaluation of the district judge over and above the prorated liability of the primary insurer for compensatory damages, and we find no error in the judgment. Accordingly, it follows that the judgment appealed from should be and is affirmed at the cost of defendant-appellant.