Deese v. Brown
Also decided on this docket: La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., February 10, 1975 308 So. 2d 314; La. Ct. App. 4th Cir., April 10, 1979 370 So. 2d 672
Deese v. Brown, 161 So. 2d 108 (La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964).
Cited by
- Napoleon v. Administrator, Division of Employment Security 166 So. 2d 324 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- Walker v. Brown 160 So. 2d 258
Opinion text
HARDY, Judge. This is a suit for unemployment benefits, and defendant-employer appeals from judgment on judicial review in favor of claimant. The case involves the usual questions, first, as to whether the evidence was sufficient to support the finding of the Administrative Tribunals, and, second, whether the actions of the claimant constituted misconduct as legally defined. The alleged misconduct in this case concerns the failure of the employee, after a period of disability due to a compensable injury, to report to his employer for work. The identical question has been presented to this court and decided in the case of Walker v. Brown, Administrator, 160 So.2d 258 . As observed in the Walker case, an employee cannot be said to “leave ‘his employment without good cause’ ” when he terminates such employment because of injuries received on the job. Accordingly, the judgment appealed from is affirmed at appellant’s cost.