No. 10139
Precedential
Affirmed
Processed
Stewart v. Young
Stewart v. Young, 161 So. 2d 293 (La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964).
Cited by
- Kirkland v. Entergy New Orleans, Inc. 779 So. 2d 42 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
- Hemphill v. Strain 341 So. 2d 1186 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
- Fisher v. Cash Grocery and Sales 316 So. 2d 872 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1975
- Miller v. East Ascension Telephone Co. 263 So. 2d 360 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
- Walker v. Firemen's Insurance Co. 264 So. 2d 277 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
- Bart v. Williams 262 So. 2d 523 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
- Iacoponelli v. Curro 260 So. 2d 166 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
- Simmons Co. v. Furniture Distributors of Plaquemines Parish, Inc. 221 So. 2d 672 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
- Penton v. Travelers Insurance Co. 220 So. 2d 195 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
- Kinchen v. Traders & General Insurance 198 So. 2d 114 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
- Burrus v. Guest House of Opelousas, Inc. 195 So. 2d 173 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
- Normand Company v. Abraham 176 So. 2d 178 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1965
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- Williamson v. Stewart 161 So. 2d 290
Opinion text
AYRES, Judge. This is a companion case to that of Williamson et vir v. Stewart et al, ( 161 So.2d 290 ). The question of liability was determined in the companion case adversely to plaintiffs in the instant case, and, therefore, for the reasons therein assigned, we find no error in the judgment. Hence, the judgment appealed is affirmed at plaintiffs-appellants’ cost. Affirmed.