Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite King v. Atkins, 33 La. Ann. 1057.
-
Malveaux v. Buller
135 So. 2d 368
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1961
See, also, ; Crescent City Ice Co. v. Ermann, 36 La.Ann.
-
Davis v. Unity Life Ins. Co.
43 So. 2d 67
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1949
Davidson v. De Lallande, 12 La.
-
Chelette v. Chelette
5 So. 2d 553
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1942
King v. Atkins ; First National Bank of Ruston v. Jones, 186 La.
-
Frierson v. New York Life Ins. Co.
142 So. 256
La. 1932
bears some similarity to the present case.
-
Frierson v. New York Life Ins.
142 So. 256
La. 1932
bears some similarity to the present case.
-
Rousseau v. Texas & Pacific
4 La. App. 691
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1926
Ann. 1073 ; King vs. Atkinson, ; Dotson vs. La.
- Logan v. Walker 94 So. 430 La. 1922
-
Wolfe v. Shreveport Gas, Electric Light & Power Co.
70 So. 789
La. 1916
95 ; King, Adm’r, v. Atkins, ; State v. Jahraus, 117 La.
-
New Orleans Acid & Fertilizer Co. v. O. Guillory & Co.
42 So. 329
La. 1906
We think not It is not, as contended, when simulation bas been “charged,” that the burden of proof shifts to the defendant, but “when facts are shown sufficient to throw doubt upon the ■reality of the sale.” .