New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.
Also decided on this docket: La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., February 7, 1980 381 So. 2d 1275
New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co., 187 So. 2d 134 (La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966).
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- Peninger v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co. 187 So. 2d 128
Opinion text
HARDY, Judge. This is one of four companion suits arising from the same accident and consolidated for purposes of trial and appeal. Plaintiff in this action is the workmen’s compensation insurer of the Caddo Parish Police Jury, owner of the truck driven by its employee, H. M. Gilbert, which was involved in the accident, and seeks to recover the amounts paid Gilbert in the nature of compensation benefits and medical expenses. From judgment in favor of defendants rejecting plaintiff’s demands it has appealed. For the reasons assigned in the opinion of this Court in the case of Peninger v. New Amsterdam Casualty Company et al., 187 So.2d 128 , which has this day been decided ; It is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the judgment appealed from be and it is affirmed at appellant’s cost.