Small v. Levy
Also decided on this docket: La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., March 23, 1966 187 So. 2d 137; La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., January 12, 1976 328 So. 2d 169
Small v. Levy, 378 So. 2d 201 (La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979).
Cited by
- Small v. Levy 381 So. 2d 1223 La. 1980
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- Bramlette v. Hebert 210 So. 2d 361
- Guidry v. Carmouche 320 So. 2d 267
Opinion text
PER CURIAM. We affirm the trial court’s action on the rule to tax costs, see Bramlette v. Hebert, 210 So.2d 361 (La.App. 3rd Cir. 1968), and turn to a consideration of the frivolity of this appeal which has, as its sole basic issue, the validity of that trial court judgment. Since LSA-C.C.P. art. 2164 must be narrowly construed and appeals favored (Guidry v. Carmouche, 320 So.2d 267 (La.App. 3rd Cir. 1975), we must reject appellee’s contentions on this issue. All costs of this appeal are taxed against appellant. AFFIRMED.