No. 10587 Precedential Processed

Manley v. Manley

Louisiana Court of Appeal, First Circuit · Filed May 30, 1966 · 188 So. 2d 194

Also decided on this docket: La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., February 4, 1980 380 So. 2d 681; La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., March 1, 1976 328 So. 2d 698

Cited by

Sanchez v. Sanchez 490 So. 2d 434 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
Oster v. Oster 480 So. 2d 470 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
McVay v. McVay 276 So. 2d 926 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1973
Blackman v. Blackman 253 So. 2d 672 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
Sadoff v. Sadoff 210 So. 2d 614 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
Stalnaker v. Stalnaker 204 So. 2d 779 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
Manley v. Manley 190 So. 2d 234 La. 1966

Opinion text

On Motion for Rehearing PER CURIAM. In a motion for rehearing, defendant-appellant complains that the court erred in holding LSA-C.C.P. Art. 197S applicable to a motion praying that this cause be remanded to the trial court for a new trial because of newly discovered evidence. The motion was without merit irrespective of the absence therefrom of applicant’s verification. Hence, it is immaterial if we may have erred in giving effect to the aforesaid article of the Code of Civil Procedure. With this observation, the motion for a rehearing is denied.