Continental Insurance Co. v. Louisiana & Arkansas Railway Co.
Continental Insurance Co. v. Louisiana & Arkansas Railway Co., 194 So. 2d 122 (La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967).
Cited by
- Hargrave v. Gaspard 419 So. 2d 918 La. 1982
- Schufford v. Masters 329 So. 2d 910 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
- Meyers v. Meyers 324 So. 2d 562 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
- Cole v. Cole 265 So. 2d 835 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
- Hebert v. Hebert 255 So. 2d 630 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1971
- Fulco v. Fulco 245 So. 2d 461 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
- Hollie v. Simon 242 So. 2d 296 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
- Nugent v. Nugent 232 So. 2d 521 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1970
- Stouder v. Stouder 224 So. 2d 855 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
- Brewer v. Macaluso 221 So. 2d 343 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
- Murray v. Murray 220 So. 2d 790 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
- Siggio v. Siggio 217 So. 2d 673 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- McDaniel v. Louisiana & Arkansas Railway Co. 194 So. 2d 119
Opinion text
HARDY, Judge. This is a companion case consolidated for the purposes of trial and appeal with McDaniel et al. v. Louisiana & Arkansas. Railway Company et al., 194 So.2d 119 ,. which has been this day decided. This is a suit by the collision insurer of the McDaniel car, as subrogee of its insured, for the recovery of the payment made for damages to the insured vehicle in the amount of $1,624.10. From judgment in favor of plaintiff as prayed defendant railway company has appealed. For the reasons assigned in the consolidated case cited supra, the judgment appealed from is affirmed at appellant’s-cost.