Reed v. Boagni
Reed v. Boagni, 146 So. 505 (La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1933).
Cited by
- Bushnell v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Ins. Co. 271 So. 2d 267 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1972
- Robertson v. Great American Indemnity Company 136 So. 2d 550 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1962
- Hebert v. Fifteen Oil Co. 46 So. 2d 328 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1950
- Franklin v. Glen Rose Gasoline Co. 187 So. 846 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1939
- Whitton v. United Gas Public Service Co. 187 So. 806 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1939
- Hennen v. Louisiana Highway Commission 178 So. 654 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1938
- Bearman v. Fuller Const. Co. 148 So. 720 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1933
Opinion text
ELLIOTT, Judge. In this case both plaintiff and defendant, appellant and appellee, applied for and were granted a rehearing. The plaintiff complains that she was not allowed to recover the sum of $277.08 as an overpayment of interest on her notes. The defendant complains of the judgment because we have condemned him to return to the plaintiff $31.36. We have reconsidered the subject-matter of both complaints, and authorities adduced in support of same, and we now feel satisfied that our first opinion and decree herein is correct and does justice to both parties. Any further remarks would serve no useful purpose and would just be -an elaboration of what is contained in our original opinion. For these reasons our former opinion and decree herein is now reinstated, and made the final judgment of this court.