State v. Schexneider
Also decided on this docket: La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., February 11, 1929 120 So. 403
State v. Schexneider, 45 La. Ann. 1445 (1893).
Cited by
- State v. Johnson 60 So. 702 La. 1912
- State v. Bertrand 49 So. 199 La. 1909
- State v. Martin 24 So. 590 La. 1898
Opinion text
The opinion of the court was delivered by McEnery, J. The accused was indicted for horse stealing. He gave bond for his appearance. This bond was forfeited. On the last day of the term at which he was to appear he was surrendered by the surety on his bond. The surety took a rule on the district attorney to show cause why the forfeiture should not be set aside. The rule was discharged. The surety appealed. Pending this appeal the defendant was convicted and is now serving the sentence imposed upon him at hard labor. *1446 This fact appears from the certificate of the trial judge filed in this case. The judgment appealed from must therefore be reversed. Lafleur vs. Mouton, 8 An. 489; State vs. Hamill, 6 An. 259. It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that the judgment appealed from be annulled, avoided and reversed, and the surety on the appearance bond be discharged.