State v. Kuntz
Also decided on this docket: La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., December 16, 1929 125 So. 160
State v. Kuntz, 47 La. Ann. 106 (1895).
The holding in the court’s own words
On the grounds announced in those opinions we hold the ordinance involved here to b© void.
Quoted verbatim from the opinion — no paraphrase, nothing generated. Not yet human-reviewed. How we find the holding.
Cited by
- City of New Orleans v. Canal Bakery & Delicatessen 3 La. App. 18 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1925
- State ex rel. Galle v. City of New Orleans 36 So. 999 La. 1904
Opinion text
*107 The opinion of the court was delivered by Miller, J. The defendant was arrested and fined for violating an ordinance of the council of the city, prohibiting the stabling of more than two horses without the council’s permission. It was this permissive feature in this ordinance that in the view of this court brought a similar ordinance in respect to stabling cows in conflict with the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States. State vs. Mahner et als., 43 An. 496; State vs. Dulaney, 43 An. 500; Yick Wo vs. Hopkins, 118 U. S. 356 . On the grounds announced in those opinions we hold the ordinance involved here to b© void. It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that the judgment of the Recorder’s Court, imposing the fine, be avoided and reversed, with costs.