Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Sincer v. Widow & Heirs of Bell, 18 So. 755.

22 citing documents.

Cole v. Celotex Corp. 599 So. 2d 1058 La. 1992
Lebleu v. Southern Silica of Louisiana 554 So. 2d 852 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
1548 , [(1895)] and Quatray v. Wicker et al., 178 La.
CAJUN ELEC. POWER CO-OP., INC. v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp. 528 So. 2d 716 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
1548 , and Quatray v. Wicker et al., 178 La.
Morris v. Kospelich 206 So. 2d 155 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1968
Minyard v. Curtis Products, Inc. 205 So. 2d 422 La. 1967
1548 , (1895), the principle that the party not at fault who has paid the damage can recover from the person actually at fault is restated by inference when the Court disallows.
Danks v. Maher 177 So. 2d 412 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1965
Harvey v. Travelers Insurance Company 163 So. 2d 915 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1964
Lanier v. TL James & Company 148 So. 2d 100 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
1548 , and Quatray v. Wicker et al, 178 La.
Brown v. New Amsterdam Casualty Company 142 So. 2d 796 La. 1962
Haindel v. Sewerage & Water Board 115 So. 2d 871 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1959
1548 , ; Toye Bros. Yellow Cab Co. v. V-8 Cab Co., La.App., ; Spanja v. Thibodaux Boiler Works, La.App., ; DeCuers v. Crane Co., La.App., ; May v. Cooperative Cab Co., La.
Rice v. Traders & General Insurance Company 114 So. 2d 92 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1959
1548 , ), or if such party is dismissed from the suit and plaintiff does not appeal from such dismissal but proceeds against the codefendant alone (cf., Spanja v. Thibodaux Boiler Works, La.App.Orleans, ).
Kahn v. Urania Lumber Company 103 So. 2d 476 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1958
1548 , ; Toye Bros. Yellow Cab Co. v. V-8 Cab Co., La.App., ; Spanja v. Thibodaux Boiler Works, La.
Chavers v. AR Blossman, Inc. 45 So. 2d 398 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1950
1548 , , (1895), very carefully pointing out that the earlier case was authority only for the rule that one joint tort feasor compelled by a judgment to pay damages can not enforce contribution from another joint tort feasor who was not judicially compelled to pay damages with him.
Spanja v. Thibodaux Boiler Works 37 So. 2d 615 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1948
In that decision (Quatray v. Wicker), , 18 So.
Winford v. Bullock 26 So. 2d 822 La. 1946
1548 , ; Quatray v. Wicker, 178 La.
Toye Bros. Yellow Cab Co. v. V-8 Cab Co. 18 So. 2d 514 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1944
1548 , ; Aetna Life Insurance Co. v. DeJean, 185 La.
Aetna Life Ins. Co. v. De Jean 171 So. 450 La. 1936
1548 , , and Quatray v. Wicker, 178 La.
&198tna Life Ins. Co. v. Dejean 167 So. 864 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1936
1548 , , where the plaintiff, who had been condemned in damages for negligence, sought to force defendant, Bell, who had compromised with the injured persons, to contribute part of the amount of damages plaintiff was forced to pay.
Quatray v. Wicker 151 So. 208 La. 1933
Thalheim v. Suhren 137 So. 874 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1931
Rumpf v. Callo 132 So. 763 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1931
Appalachian Corp. v. Brooklyn Cooperage Co. 91 So. 539 La. 1922
If Mrs. Sill had been sued and condemned separately, the principle recognized would have been equally applicable, and on paying the judgment she would have had her action against Champagne, , 18 South.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by