Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Brownson v. Weeks, 17 So. 489.
- Marshall v. Wells 381 So. 2d 551 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1980
-
York v. Harper
91 So. 2d 423
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1956
With reference to these, the Supreme Court in Brownson v. Weeks, 1895, , 17 So.
-
Whitney Nat. Bank of New Orleans v. Schwob
13 So. 2d 782
La. 1943
1042 , ; Doucet v. Fenelon, 120 La.
-
Cook v. Crow
194 So. 455
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1939
1042 , , is cited in support of the above plea.
-
Tillery v. Fuller
182 So. 683
La. 1938
1042 , ; Munholland v. Fakes, 111 La.
-
Berry v. Franklin State Bank & Trust Co.
173 So. 126
La. 1937
1042 , , where it was held that article 3542 applied to all cases where the ground of nullity was the incapacity of the person contracting.
- Pitre v. Fontenot 154 So. 652 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1934
- Dares v. O'Donnell 151 So. 774 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1934
-
De Soto Corporation v. Roberts Lumber G. Co.
141 So. 78
La. 1932
366 ] it was said: “ ‘In all cases of executed contracts susceptible of ratification, a presumption of ratification juris et de jure results from silence and inaction during the time fixed for prescription.’ “ .
-
Ford v. Russell
128 So. 310
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1930
Ann. page 1042, , discussed these two articles, and, after stating certain situations to which the five-year prescription set forth in article 3542 applied, said: .
- Fridge v. Bank of Baton Rouge 114 So. 90 La. 1927
-
Barnes v. Barnes
99 So. 719
La. 1924
Ann. 328 ; -1053 , 17 South.
- Castleman v. Smith 99 So. 293 La. 1924
- Otis v. Texas Co. 96 So. 1 La. 1922
- Jackson v. Currie 80 So. 210 La. 1918
- Louisiana Sulphur Mining Co. v. Brimstone R. & Canal Co. 79 So. 324 La. 1918
-
Weathersby v. Springfield Lumber Co.
75 So. 416
La. 1917
The only difficulty in the case arises from the fact that article 2221 of the Code provides that; “In all cases in which the action of nullity or of rescission of an agreement is not limited to a shorter period by a particular law, that action may be brought within ten years.” , 17 South.
- Munholland v. Fakes 35 So. 983 La. 1903
- Cox v. Lea's Heirs 35 So. 275 La. 1902