Kahle v. Michel
Kahle v. Michel, 121 So. 684 (La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1929).
Cited by
- Templet v. Travelers Insurance Company 278 So. 2d 805 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
- Ousley v. Employers Mutual Liability Insurance Company of Wisconsin 121 So. 2d 378 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
- Franklin v. Louisiana Highway Commission 152 So. 604 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1934
Opinion text
WESTE'RFIELD, J. This is a suit by a doctor for his bill. Defendant claims that the doctor’s bookkeeping is at fault and that many debit items are erroneous. The court, a qua, allowed a credit of $67.00, giving the doctor a judgment for $163.00. The services extended over a period of more than a year and consist of many office consultations and some house visits. It seems to us that the judgment made sufficient allowance for erroneous charges, which, in some instances, were proven to have been made. In any event, this case is • one to which the familiar doctrine, that findings of fact by a trial court will not be disturbed on appeal unless manifestly erroneous, is particularly applicable. For the reasons assigned the judgment appealed from is affirmed.