Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite New Orleans, Fort Jackson & Grand Isle Railroad v. McNeely, 17 So. 798.

16 citing documents.

Columbia Gulf Transmission Co. v. C. J. Grayson, Inc. 232 So. 2d 150 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
1298 , , this question was considered.
State v. Rownd 119 So. 2d 282 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1960
1298 , , this question was considered.
Griffin v. Bank of Abbeville & Trust Co. 69 So. 2d 153 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1953
1298 , ; Trenchard v. New Orleans Ry.
McConnell v. Webb 55 So. 2d 192 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1951
1298 , ; Roden v. Aldy, 9 La.App.
Louisiana Power Light Co. v. Mosley 18 So. 2d 210 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1944
1298 , , this question was considered.
Housing Authority of New Orleans v. Polmer 197 So. 247 La. 1940
1298 , ; City of Shreveport v. Pedro, 170 La.
Housing Authority of New Orleans v. Weis 196 So. 328 La. 1940
1298, 1300 , ; New Orleans & Western Railroad Company v. Bartholomew Morere, 48 La.Ann.
Louisiana Highway Commission v. Giaccone 140 So. 286 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1932
921, 924 , in which the court declared that in repeated decisions it had been held: “ * * ⅜ That the amount of compensation allowed by a jury in expropriation proceedings should not be reduced unless it is manifestly excessive (N. O., F. J. & , 17 So.
Louisiana Highway Commission v. Spikes 138 So. 691 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1932
City of Shreveport v. Herndon 136 So. 297 La. 1931
Givens v. Yazoo M.V.R. Co. 137 So. 66 La. 1931
City of Baton Rouge v. Cross 85 So. 883 La. 1920
City of Shreveport v. Simon 70 So. 418 La. 1915
Trenchard v. New Orleans Ry. & Light Co. 48 So. 575 La. 1908
City of Shreveport v. Youree 38 So. 135 La. 1905
Kansas City, Shreveport & Gulf Railway Co. v. Heirs of Smith 25 So. 955 La. 1899
Their verdicts are, indeed, subject to review by appeal, and may be amended when manifestly inadequate or excessive; but they are entitled to great respect and will not be interfered with except in case of gross or manifest error.” See also R. R. Co. vs. McNeeley, ; 12 La.