Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Chamberlain v. Abadie, 19 So. 574.

29 citing documents.

Heirs of John Beckwith LLC, Price Heirs LLC, James M. Foster Trust, Linda Price Ellzey, John v. Price, … La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2021
See Jacobs v. S. Advance Bag & Paper Co., (1955); (La.
City of New Orleans v. New Orleans Canal, Inc. 412 So. 2d 975 La. 1982
Execution of an oil and gas lease, , 19 So.
Ryder v. Lacour 322 So. 2d 243 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1976
587 , (1896); Ree Corp. v. Shaffer, 261 La.
Liner v. Louisiana Land and Exploration Co. 319 So. 2d 766 La. 1975
587, 590 , (1896), in which the court was of the opinion that: "The carporeal possession necessary to support the prescription is governed by the use for which the land is destined'; and Bogani v. Pacific Imp.
Woods v. Stoma 242 So. 2d 320 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
International Paper Co. v. Masters 103 So. 2d 557 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
587 , ; Art. 847, LSA-C.C.; Collett v. Otis, La.App.1955, ; Rhodes v. Collier, 1949, 215 La.
Boudreaux v. Olin Industries, Inc. 94 So. 2d 417 La. 1957
587 , ; Snelling v. Adair, 196 La.
Young v. Hillyer Deutsch Edwards, Inc. 62 So. 2d 859 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1953
Hill v. Richey 59 So. 2d 434 La. 1952
587 , ; Boagni v. Pacific Imp.
Kelso v. Caffery 58 So. 2d 402 La. 1952
587 , , 575: “The corporeal possession necessary to support the prescription is governed by the use for which the land is destined.
Nixon v. English 22 So. 2d 266 La. 1945
587 , ; Martel v. Hunt, supra; Long v. Chailan, supra; Snelling v. Adair, 196 La.
Veltin v. Haas 21 So. 2d 862 La. 1945
Chapman-Storm Lumber Co. v. Board of Com'rs for Atchafalaya Basin Levee Dist. 200 So. 455 La. 1941
Snelling v. Adair 199 So. 782 La. 1940
587 , ; Boagni v. Pacific Imp.
Long v. Chailan 199 So. 222 La. 1940
587 , ; Industrial Lumber Co. v. Farque, 162 La.
Martel v. Hunt 197 So. 402 La. 1940
587 , , this court said: • “The corporeal possession necessary to support the prescription is governed by the use for which the land is destined.
Jackson v. Gordon 186 So. 399 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1939
Duffourc v. Constantin 181 So. 183 La. 1938
587 , ; Lacroix v. Villio, 123 La.
Zylks v. Kaempfer 180 So. 425 La. 1938
587 , ; Railsback v. Keith, 142 La.
Scott v. Brown Paper Mill Co. 174 So. 212 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1937
Buckley v. Dumond 156 So. 784 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1934
Civil Code, art. 1924, provides: “What shall he considered a delivery of possession is determined by the rules of law, applicable to .the situation and nature of the property.” , 19 So.
Plumb v. Hammond Lands, Inc. 134 So. 298 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1931
Wheat v. Bayer & Thayer Hardwood Co. 131 So. 307 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1930
W. W. Duson, Inc. v. Hunsicker 120 So. 86 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1928
215 ; Chamberlin vs. Abadie, , 19 So.
Blanchard v. Estate of Hy Garland 6 La. App. 508 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1927
Chamberlin vs. Abadie, , 19 South.
Bornio v. Berger 1 La. App. 482 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1925
Ann. 250 ; Chamberlain vs. Abadie, , 19 South.
Gilmore v. Frost-Johnson Lumber Co. 71 So. 536 La. 1916
784 , in both of which cases the prescription of ten years was invoked in defense of a tax title, , 19 South.
McQueen v. Flasdick-Black Land & Lumber Co. 65 So. 900 La. 1914
606 ]; Chamberlain v. Abadie] [ 19 South.
Ashley Co. v. Bradford 33 So. 634 La. 1902
While this kind of possession — constructive or civil in character — may not suffice for the .prescription by which the ownership of property is aided or acquired ( , 19 South.