Chambers Roy & Co. v. Knapp
Chambers Roy & Co. v. Knapp, 20 So. 677 (La. 1896).
Cited by
- Hartson, Inc. v. Brawley & Watson, Inc. 180 So. 2d 588 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
- W. W. Carre Co. v. E. J. Stewart & Co. 117 So. 238 La. 1928
Opinion text
The opinion of the court was delivered by Breaux, J. The facts are similar to those in the case of A. Lehman & Co. vs. S. A. Knapp et als., ante, p. 1148, save that the plaintiffs held notes representing defendants’ indebtedness to them. The acceptance of a note is not deemed a payment or novation unless the parties so agree. It follows that if a corporation becomes indebted at. a time when those who organized it are in default in not properly indicating, as-the State requires, that it is a company limited, they are liable personally and are not discharged by the fact that their creditors accepted their note. The judgment is therefore affirmed.