Chas. E. Spencer & Co. v. Bloomfield & Steel
Also decided on this docket: La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., July 1, 1963 156 So. 2d 718; La., June 15, 1885 37 La. Ann. 646; La. Ct. App. 3d Cir., June 24, 1964 166 So. 2d 84
Chas. E. Spencer & Co. v. Bloomfield & Steel, 20 La. 225 (1868).
Opinion text
Idsdey, J. The defendants have taken a suspensive appeal from a judgment rendered against them on a money-claim in favor of the plaintiffs. We can perceive no error in the judgment rendered by the lower Court, and none has been pointed out to ns by the appellants, and it seems evident that delay was the object of the appeal. It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that the judgment of the District Court be affirmed, with five per cent, damages, at the costs of the •appellants.