No. 11322 Precedential Dismissed Processed

State ex rel. Sabine River Authority v. Pierce

Louisiana Court of Appeal, First Circuit · Filed January 6, 1970 · 230 So. 2d 751

Also decided on this docket: La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., July 7, 1981 402 So. 2d 234

Cited by

State ex rel. Sabine River Authority v. Pierce 231 So. 2d 396 La. 1970
State ex rel. Sabine River Authority v. Pierce 230 So. 2d 752 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970

Authorities cited

Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.

State ex rel. Sabine River Authority v. Pierce 230 So. 2d 752
Benedict v. Stulb 230 La. 995

Opinion text

DIXON, Judge. This case was consolidated for the purpose of trial with No. 11,323, State of Loui *752 siana, through the Sabine River Authority, State of Louisiana v. Pierce et al., La.App., 230 So.2d 752 . Both cases involve the expropriation of tracts of land in DeSoto Parish by the Sabine River Authority. There was judgment in each case in favor of the defendants. The plaintiff appealed, but, until after the day fixed for submission of the case, made no appearance nor filed any brief. Under the authority of Rule VII, Section 5(b) of the Uniform Rules of the Courts of Appeal, the appeal should be dismissed. See Benedict v. Stulb, 230 La. 995 , 89 So.2d 768 . Appeal dismissed.