State ex rel. Sabine River Authority v. Pierce
Also decided on this docket: La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., November 12, 1980 391 So. 2d 84; La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., June 13, 1977 347 So. 2d 1194
State ex rel. Sabine River Authority v. Pierce, 230 So. 2d 752 (La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970).
Cited by
- State ex rel. Sabine River Authority v. Pierce 231 So. 2d 396 La. 1970
- State ex rel. Sabine River Authority v. Pierce 230 So. 2d 751 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- State ex rel. Sabine River Authority v. Pierce 230 So. 2d 751
- Benedict v. Stulb 230 La. 995
Opinion text
DIXON, Judge. This case was consolidated for the purpose of trial with No. 11,322, State of Louisiana, through the Sabine River Authority, State of Louisiana v. Pierce et al., La.App., 230 So.2d 751 . Both cases involve the expropriation of tracts of land in DeSoto Parish by the Sabine River Authority. There was judgment in each case in favor of the defendants. The plaintiff appealed, but, until after the day fixed for submission of the case, made no appearance nor filed any brief. Under the authority of Rule VII, Section 5(b) of the Uniform Rules of the Courts of Appeal, the appeal should be dismissed. See Benedict v. Stulb, 230 La. 995 , 89 So.2d 768 . Appeal dismissed.