Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Tregre v. Kratzer, 148 So. 271.

14 citing documents.

Norton ex rel. Norton v. Hale 505 So. 2d 869 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
Chase v. Dunbar 185 So. 2d 563 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
Tregre v. Kratzer, La.App., .
Allen v. Travelers Insurance Co. 124 So. 2d 367 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
The conflict between the views expressed by this court in Tregre v. Kratzer, La.App., , and Lewis v. A. Moresi Co., La.App., 196 So.
Meyers v. Southwest Region Conference Ass'n of Seventh Day Adventists 79 So. 2d 595 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
the Court of Appeal for the First Circuit held that the employees were not within the *600 protection of the compensation statute although they were transported to and from their work in motor vehicles.
Griffin v. Catherine Sugar Co. 54 So. 2d 121 La. 1951
Lewis v. A. Moresi Co., 196 So.
Franz v. Sun Indemnity Co. of New York 7 So. 2d 636 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1942
414 ; Tregre v. Kratzer, La.App., ; Stockstill v. Sears-Roebuck Co., La.App., 151 So.
Robinson v. Atkinson 3 So. 2d 600 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1941
414 ; Tregre v. Kratzer, La.App., ; Stockstill v. Sears-Roebuck Co., La.App., 151 So.
Allen v. Yantis 196 So. 530 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1940
was not based altogether on the above reasoning, yet we are persuaded that the decision is correct in principle for the reason that the employer was engaged in the nonhazardous business of farming and the injured employees were not required as a part of their duties to perform any hazardous duties.
Lewis v. A. Moresi Co. 196 So. 70 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1940
Under the facts stated with regard to transporting or conveying the employee, we find a , in which this Court held that the claim of the injured employee was not governed by the provisions of the Workmen’s Compensation Statute.
Robichaux v. Realty Operators, Inc. 191 So. 326 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1939
688 ; Tregre et al. v. Kratzer et al., La.App., ; Comeaux v. South Coast Corporation, La.App., 175 So.
Mitcham v. Urania Lumber Co. 185 So. 707 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1939
App. 159 ; Tregre v. Kratzer, La.App., .
Comeaux v. South Coast Corporation 175 So. 177 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1937
for there the employee involved was a farm laborer in a rice field.
Crews v. Levitan Smart Shops, Inc. 171 So. 608 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1937
decided by the Court of Appeal for the First Circuit, is difficult to reconcile with the conclusion we have come to in this case and with the Labostrie, Richardson, and Haddad Cases which we have discussed.
Lutz v. Long-Bell Lumber Sales Corp. 153 So. 319 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1934