No. 1147. Precedential Processed

Kean's Inc. v. Willoughby

Louisiana Court of Appeal, First Circuit · Filed October 5, 1933 · 150 So. 40

Also decided on this docket: La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., June 30, 1933 149 So. 237

Cited by

Mudd v. Travelers Indemnity Company 295 So. 2d 540 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1974
Dore v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company 180 So. 2d 434 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1965
Riche v. Ascension Parish School Board 200 So. 681 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1941

Opinion text

PER CURIAM. In his application for -rehearing, defendant complains that the dismissal of his appeal by the judgment of this court deprives him of the right to prosecute his claim for attorney’s fees and for one week’s wages as contained in his reconventional demand. These claims, of course, were only incidental to. the main demand, and necessarily had to fall with it. Moreover, it is apparent that the total amount of the items claimed, as they appear on the face of the papers, is below the! jurisdiction of this court, and we would be without power to entertain them. The questiort of delays raised in the application was considered and fully explained in the original opinion. Rehearing refused.