Newland v. Curfman
Also decided on this docket: La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., December 2, 1963 159 So. 2d 1; La., June 15, 1888 40 La. Ann. 620; La., July 15, 1883 35 La. Ann. 984; La., February 15, 1868 20 La. 131
Newland v. Curfman, 166 So. 2d 362 (La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964).
Cited by
- Tippen v. Baker 718 So. 2d 617 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
- Alonzo v. Alonzo 634 So. 2d 54 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
- Deshotel v. Casualty Reciprocal Exch. 350 So. 2d 283 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1977
- Crandall v. Scott 350 So. 2d 922 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1977
- Shaw v. Hopkins 338 So. 2d 961 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1976
- Nicosia v. Guillory 322 So. 2d 129 La. 1975
- Wooten v. Wimberly 272 So. 2d 303 La. 1973
- Hathorn v. McKay 236 So. 2d 74 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
- Deshotel v. Travelers Indemnity Company 231 So. 2d 448 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1970
- Williams v. City of Baton Rouge 214 So. 2d 138 La. 1968
- Guidry v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. 201 So. 2d 534 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1967
- Williams v. City of Baton Rouge 200 So. 2d 420 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- Phillips v. Newland 166 So. 2d 357
Opinion text
FRUGÉ, Judge. For the reasons set forth in Phillips v. Newland, No. 1195, 166 So.2d 357 , decided this date, it is hereby ordered, adjudged and decreed that there be judgment herein in favor of the defendants, Hugh W. Curf-man, C. J. Palmer, and Lois B. Phillips, and against plaintiff John G. Newland, dismissing plaintiff’s suit. In all other respects the judgment of the district court is affirmed. Plaintiff is assessed costs of this appeal. Amended and affirmed.