Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Johnson, 19 So. 213.

21 citing documents.

State v. Eyer 110 So. 2d 521 La. 1959
87 , ; State v. Young, 114 La.
State v. Neal 93 So. 2d 554 La. 1957
[87] 89, ; State v. Johnson, 119 La.
State v. Labat 75 So. 2d 333 La. 1954
87 , ; State v. Hamilton, 124 La.
State v. Alexander 40 So. 2d 232 La. 1949
87 , ; State v. Hamilton, 124 La.
State v. Tucker 15 So. 2d 854 La. 1943
State v. Augusta 7 So. 2d 177 La. 1942
State v. Davis 151 So. 78 La. 1933
State v. Johnson & Butler, , 19 So.
State v. Taylor 133 So. 349 La. 1931
State v. McCullough 121 So. 609 La. 1929
611 ; State v. Johnson & Butler, , 19 So.
State v. Dreher 118 So. 85 La. 1928
“To justify setting aside a verdict of a jury, approved by the trial judge, on the ground of intemperate or improper remarks by a district attorney, this court would have to be thoroughly convinced that the jury was influenced by such remarks, and, as well, that the remarks contributed to the verdict found.” State v. Johnson & Butler, , 19 So.
State v. Brown 116 So. 588 La. 1928
State v. Johnson 107 So. 309 La. 1926
“Argument of counsel is left in great part with the trial court to restrain within due bounds, and unless it goes entirely too far, there will be no interference on appeal.” , 48 La.
State v. Constanza 102 So. 507 La. 1924
State v. Jackson 77 So. 484 La. 1917
State v. Benjamin 53 So. 847 La. 1910
State v. Johnson 53 So. 702 La. 1910
nk the matter falls within our ruling to the effect that: “To justify setting aside a verdict of a jury, approved by 'the trial judge, on the ground of intemperate or improper remarks by a district attorney, this court would have to be thoroughly convinced that'the jury was influenced by such remarks, and, as well, that the remarks contributed to the verdict found.” State v. Johnson & Butler, , 19 South.
State v. Williams 50 So. 711 La. 1909
State v. Hamilton 49 So. 1004 La. 1909
Marr’s Criminal Jurisprudence of La., p. 708; , 19 South.
State v. Johnson 43 So. 981 La. 1907
State v. Gallo 39 So. 1001 La. 1905
Followed State v. Meche 38 So. 152 La. 1905
The evidence showed a cold-blooded and deliberate murder.” , 19 South.