Baker v. Lee
Baker v. Lee, 21 So. 588 (La. 1897).
Cited by
- Meridian Fertilizer Factory v. Collier 192 So. 358 La. 1939
- Fisher v. Levy 156 So. 220 La. 1934
- Davis v. Welch 55 So. 372 La. 1911
- Borah & Landen v. O'Niell 46 So. 788 La. 1908
Opinion text
On Application for Rehearing. On this application for the rehearing our attention is directed to that part of our decree condemning defendants to pay costs.. The litigation is between the plaintiffs, and not the original *880 defendants, but the defendants in the rule to erase mortgages. Our judgment is against the defendants in the rule, not against the original defendants. We will therefore make our judgment more specific as to costs. It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that our former judgment be so amended as to direct, and accordingly it is now ordered and decreed that the defendants in the rule to erase mortgages, the Ouachita National Bank and Meyer Bros., pay the costs on that rule incurred in the lower court and on this appeal; in all other respects our former decree to remain unchanged, and to stand as rendered.