Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State National Bank v. New Orleans Brewing Ass'n, 22 So. 48.

17 citing documents.

Thomason v. Thomason 355 So. 2d 908 La. 1978
897 , (1897); Castanedo v. Fortier, 34 La.Ann.
O'Neill v. O'Neill 196 So. 2d 669 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
897 , (1897), the Supreme-Court said: “ * * * the law which provides for a. separation from bed and board in certain» cases is made for the relief of the oppressed party, not for interfering in quarrels where both spouses commit reciprocal excesses and outrages.” In Abele v. Barker, 200 La.
Gayle v. Gayle 181 So. 2d 72 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
Lane v. Lane 165 So. 2d 682 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
897 , ; Durand v. Her Husband, 4 Mart., O.S., 174.
Fleming v. Lee 145 So. 2d 618 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
897 , ; Ducros v. Ducros, 156 La.
Fouquier v. Fouquier 91 So. 2d 591 La. 1956
897 , ; Ducros v. Ducros, 156 La.
Eals v. Swan 59 So. 2d 409 La. 1952
897 , ; Durand v. Her Husband, 4 Mart.; O.S., 174.
Abele v. Barker 7 So. 2d 684 La. 1942
897 , , this court held that: "The law which provides for a separation from bed and board in certain cases is made for the relief of the oppressed party, not for interfering in quarrels where both spouses commit reciprocal excesses and outrages.” (Syllabus.)
Succession of Gravolet 197 So. 572 La. 1940
934 , , this court, in discussing the meaning of the above article of the Code, said: “Hence the Code itself declares it is the cession of property, not actual or supposed insolvency, that matures the debt.
Adranga v. Tardo 180 So. 484 La. 1938
897 , , affirmed “the doctrine announced in a yery early case, that the law which provides for a separation from bed and board in certain cases is made for the relief of the oppressed party, not for interfering in quarrels where both parties commit reciprocal excesses and outrages.
Labiche v. Knight 162 So. 188 La. 1935
Ann. 897 , , it was held: “The law which provides for a separation from bed and board in certain cases is made for the relief of the oppressed party, not for interfering in quarrels where both parties commit reciprocal excesses and outrages.” From the facts as presented, the court found that both spouses were equally blamable an
Anisman v. Nagle 148 So. 885 La. 1933
Dixon v. Watson 143 So. 683 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1932
Bank v. Brewing Ass’n, , 22 So.
Edwards v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. 123 So. 162 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1929
State National Bank vs. N. O. Brewing Association et al., , 22 So.
Gormley v. Gormley 108 So. 307 La. 1926
National Park Bank v. Concordia Land & Timber Co. 105 So. 234 La. 1925
582 ; Harrod v. Burges, 5 R. 449 ; Denegre v. Milne, 10 A. 324 ; Seixas v. Bank, 38 A. 443 ; Taylor v. Drane, 13 A. 64 ; Blanchard v. Grousset, 1 A. 96 ; National Bank v. N. O. Brewing Ass’n, 49 A. 934 ( ).” *109 For these reasons, we are of the opinion that the judgment appealed from is correct, and it is therefore affirmed, at appellant’s cost.
Snell v. Aucoin 104 So. 709 La. 1925
Ann. 897 , ; Durand v. Her Husband, 4 Mart.